<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(2)</volume><submitter>Unglaub JM</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Abstract&lt;/h4>The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents has been approved for first-line treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive treatment. VEN-containing treatment strategies may also be effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML; however, comparative studies with conventional therapies for fit patients as a bridge-to-transplant strategy are limited. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we compared 37 patients with R/R AML, who received VEN-based salvage therapy as bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), with 90 patients from the German Study Alliance Leukemia AML registry, who were treated with non-VEN-containing salvage therapy according to their treating phys</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood advances</journal><pagination>375-385</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11787451</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Venetoclax-based salvage therapy as a bridge to transplant is feasible and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory AML.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11787451</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kraus S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sauer T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Einsele H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pabst C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dreger P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Renders S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bornhauser M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krause SW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kauer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zukunft S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Middeke JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muller-Tidow C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kramer M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luft T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Unglaub JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schlenk RF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rollig C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schliemann C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katelari E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Venetoclax-based salvage therapy as a bridge to transplant is feasible and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory AML.</name><description>&lt;h4>Abstract&lt;/h4>The B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypomethylating agents has been approved for first-line treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for intensive treatment. VEN-containing treatment strategies may also be effective in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML; however, comparative studies with conventional therapies for fit patients as a bridge-to-transplant strategy are limited. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we compared 37 patients with R/R AML, who received VEN-based salvage therapy as bridge to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), with 90 patients from the German Study Alliance Leukemia AML registry, who were treated with non-VEN-containing salvage therapy according to their treating phys</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jan</publication><modification>2026-06-01T10:26:18.728Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T13:11:30.696Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11787451</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39293081</pubmed><doi>10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013086</doi></cross_references></HashMap>