<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Guillen N</submitter><funding>Fundació Docència i Recerca Mútua de Terrassa</funding><funding>Instituto de Salud Carlos III</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>Diputació de Lleida</funding><funding>Foundation for the National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>Fundación BBVA</funding><funding>Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya</funding><funding>Universitat de Barcelona</funding><funding>Fundació la Marató de TV3</funding><funding>Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas</funding><pagination>257-266</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11799063</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>275(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Core Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have shown incomplete agreement with amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET). Our goal was to analyze the agreement between AD CSF biomarkers and amyloid-PET in a multicenter study. Retrospective multicenter study (5 centers). Participants who underwent both CSF biomarkers and amyloid-PET scan within 18 months were included. Clinical diagnoses were made according to latest diagnostic criteria by the attending clinicians. CSF Amyloid Beta&lt;sub>1-42&lt;/sub> (Aβ&lt;sub>1-42&lt;/sub>, A), phosphorliated tau 181 (pTau181, T) and total tau (tTau, N) biomarkers were considered normal (-) or abnormal ( +) according to cutoffs of each center. Amyloid-PET was visually classified as positive/negative. Agreement between CSF biomarkers and am</pubmed_abstract><journal>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</journal><pubmed_title>Agreement of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid-PET in a multicenter study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11799063</pmcid><funding_grant_id>SLT006/17/125</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PERIS SLT002/16/408</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Program 1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PI19/00449</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AGAUR</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PERIS 2019 SLT008/18/00050</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>20141210</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RF1 AG061566</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PI20/01473</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>SLT006/17/119</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PI14/01126</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2022</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>INT19/00016</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PIRS2021</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Alzheimer Disease</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>FI20/00076</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PI17/01019</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PI17/01896</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PERIS 2016-2020 SLT008/18/00061</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>20142610</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AC19/00103</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21AG056974</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PI18/00435</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01AG061566</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1R01AG056850-01A1</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Alvarez I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lourdes Ispierto M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alcolea D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Llado A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carnes-Vendrell A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vilas D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Culell N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guillen N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puig-Pijoan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balasa M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fortea J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pinol-Ripoll G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Contador J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez-Lebrero A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buongiorno M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lleo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanchez-Valle R</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Agreement of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid-PET in a multicenter study.</name><description>Core Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have shown incomplete agreement with amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET). Our goal was to analyze the agreement between AD CSF biomarkers and amyloid-PET in a multicenter study. Retrospective multicenter study (5 centers). Participants who underwent both CSF biomarkers and amyloid-PET scan within 18 months were included. Clinical diagnoses were made according to latest diagnostic criteria by the attending clinicians. CSF Amyloid Beta&lt;sub>1-42&lt;/sub> (Aβ&lt;sub>1-42&lt;/sub>, A), phosphorliated tau 181 (pTau181, T) and total tau (tTau, N) biomarkers were considered normal (-) or abnormal ( +) according to cutoffs of each center. Amyloid-PET was visually classified as positive/negative. Agreement between CSF biomarkers and am</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-22T12:38:08.899Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T00:20:36.724Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11799063</accession><cross_references><pubmed>37898567</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00406-023-01701-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>