{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Hanmer J"],"funding":["NCCIH NIH HHS"],"pagination":["43-51"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11802291"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["34(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Purpose</h4>Preference-based summary scores are used to quantify values, differences, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) measure is a preference-based summary score comprised of 7 PROMIS domains. The PROMIS-16 is a new PROMIS profile instrument. We evaluated the measurement properties of PROPr generated from the widely used PROMIS-29 + 2 compared with the PROMIS-16.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a secondary analysis of data from an online survey of the general US population, with a longitudinal subsample who reported back pain. The survey included both the PROMIS-16 and the PROMIS-29 + 2 profiles. PROPr scores were calculated from each profile and compared by the distribution of scores, ove"],"journal":["Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation"],"pubmed_title":["Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16."],"pmcid":["PMC11802291"],"funding_grant_id":["R01 AT010402"],"pubmed_authors":["Zeng C","Cizik AM","Raad JH","Tsevat J","Hanmer J","Edelen MO","Hays RD","Rodriguez A"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.","description":"<h4>Purpose</h4>Preference-based summary scores are used to quantify values, differences, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) measure is a preference-based summary score comprised of 7 PROMIS domains. The PROMIS-16 is a new PROMIS profile instrument. We evaluated the measurement properties of PROPr generated from the widely used PROMIS-29 + 2 compared with the PROMIS-16.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a secondary analysis of data from an online survey of the general US population, with a longitudinal subsample who reported back pain. The survey included both the PROMIS-16 and the PROMIS-29 + 2 profiles. PROPr scores were calculated from each profile and compared by the distribution of scores, ove","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Jan","modification":"2025-04-04T01:36:12.074Z","creation":"2025-04-04T01:36:12.074Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11802291","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39508976"],"doi":["10.1007/s11136-024-03827-5"]}}