biostudies-literatureHanmer JNCCIH NIH HHS43-51https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11802291biostudies-literatureUnknown34(1)<h4>Purpose</h4>Preference-based summary scores are used to quantify values, differences, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) measure is a preference-based summary score comprised of 7 PROMIS domains. The PROMIS-16 is a new PROMIS profile instrument. We evaluated the measurement properties of PROPr generated from the widely used PROMIS-29 + 2 compared with the PROMIS-16.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a secondary analysis of data from an online survey of the general US population, with a longitudinal subsample who reported back pain. The survey included both the PROMIS-16 and the PROMIS-29 + 2 profiles. PROPr scores were calculated from each profile and compared by the distribution of scores, oveQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitationAgreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.PMC11802291R01 AT010402Zeng CCizik AMRaad JHTsevat JHanmer JEdelen MOHays RDRodriguez AfalseAgreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.<h4>Purpose</h4>Preference-based summary scores are used to quantify values, differences, and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used for cost-effectiveness analyses. The PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) measure is a preference-based summary score comprised of 7 PROMIS domains. The PROMIS-16 is a new PROMIS profile instrument. We evaluated the measurement properties of PROPr generated from the widely used PROMIS-29 + 2 compared with the PROMIS-16.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a secondary analysis of data from an online survey of the general US population, with a longitudinal subsample who reported back pain. The survey included both the PROMIS-16 and the PROMIS-29 + 2 profiles. PROPr scores were calculated from each profile and compared by the distribution of scores, ove2025-01-01T00:00:00Z2025 Jan2025-04-04T01:36:12.074Z2025-04-04T01:36:12.074ZS-EPMC118022913950897610.1007/s11136-024-03827-5