<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Tu J</submitter><funding>Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada</funding><pagination>100978</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11809199</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>14</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between peak tibial acceleration and peak ankle joint contact forces in response to stride length manipulation during level-ground running.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty-seven physically active participants ran 10 trials at preferred speed in each of 5 stride length conditions: preferred, ±5%, and ±10% of preferred stride length. Motion capture, force platform, and tibial acceleration data were directly measured, and ankle joint contact forces were estimated using an inverse-dynamics-based static optimization routine.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In general, peak axial tibial accelerations (p &lt; 0.001) as well as axial (p &lt; 0.001) and resultant (p &lt; 0.001) ankle joint contact forces increased with stride length. When averaged within the 10 strides of </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of sport and health science</journal><pubmed_title>Tibial acceleration alone is not a valid surrogate measure of tibial load in response to stride length manipulation.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11809199</pmcid><funding_grant_id>CGS D\u2013534891-2019</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RGPIN 02404-2021</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bruce OL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edwards WB</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Tibial acceleration alone is not a valid surrogate measure of tibial load in response to stride length manipulation.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between peak tibial acceleration and peak ankle joint contact forces in response to stride length manipulation during level-ground running.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twenty-seven physically active participants ran 10 trials at preferred speed in each of 5 stride length conditions: preferred, ±5%, and ±10% of preferred stride length. Motion capture, force platform, and tibial acceleration data were directly measured, and ankle joint contact forces were estimated using an inverse-dynamics-based static optimization routine.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In general, peak axial tibial accelerations (p &lt; 0.001) as well as axial (p &lt; 0.001) and resultant (p &lt; 0.001) ankle joint contact forces increased with stride length. When averaged within the 10 strides of </description><dates><release>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2024 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:56:35.974Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T23:56:35.974Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11809199</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39237064</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100978</doi></cross_references></HashMap>