{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Villain P"],"funding":["World Health Organization"],"pagination":["e65974"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11822326"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["27"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>The online nature of decision aids (DAs) and related e-tools supporting women's decision-making regarding breast cancer screening (BCS) through mammography may facilitate broader access, making them a valuable addition to BCS programs.<h4>Objective</h4>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impacts of these e-tools and to provide a comprehensive assessment of the factors associated with their increased utility and efficacy.<h4>Methods</h4>We followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and conducted a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from August 2010 to April 2023. We included studies reporting on populations at average ri"],"journal":["Journal of medical Internet research"],"pubmed_title":["Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC11822326"],"funding_grant_id":["001"],"pubmed_authors":["Le Bonniec A","Nadarzynski T","Donelle L","Murillo R","Smith R","Mandrik O","Soler-Michel P","Bauquier C","Johnson S","Tolma EL","Villain P","Downham L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>The online nature of decision aids (DAs) and related e-tools supporting women's decision-making regarding breast cancer screening (BCS) through mammography may facilitate broader access, making them a valuable addition to BCS programs.<h4>Objective</h4>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impacts of these e-tools and to provide a comprehensive assessment of the factors associated with their increased utility and efficacy.<h4>Methods</h4>We followed the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and conducted a search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases from August 2010 to April 2023. We included studies reporting on populations at average ri","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Jan","modification":"2025-04-05T09:39:36.209Z","creation":"2025-04-05T09:39:36.209Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11822326","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39879616"],"doi":["10.2196/65974"]}}