<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(3)</volume><submitter>Musmar B</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The impact of multiple feeding arteries on clinical outcomes of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not well understood. This study aims to compare outcomes between AVMs with multiple versus single feeding arteries.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance cohorts. Subgroup analysis was conducted for ruptured and unruptured AVMs and different treatment options, and multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of feeding artery origin.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 953 patients, 661(69.4%) had multiple feeding arteries, and 292 (30.6%) had a single feeding artery. After PSM, which included 422 matched </pubmed_abstract><journal>European stroke journal</journal><pagination>946-960</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11830163</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Outcomes of arteriovenous malformation patients with multiple versus single feeders: A multicenter retrospective study with propensity-score matching.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11830163</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Starke RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sizdahkhani S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alaraj A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Griessenauer CJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ironside N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Erginoglu U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Orbach D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheehan J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kandregula S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen PR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koch M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cuellar HH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ogilvy CS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Essibayi MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stapleton C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdalrazeq H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sekhar LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mosimann PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdelsalam A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koduri S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poppe J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rezai A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Levitt MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Srinivasan VM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baskaya MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cochran J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aslan A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morcos J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kumbhare D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karadimas S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McAvoy M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lawton M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abla AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dmytriw AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kondziolka D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jabbour P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Muram S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burkhardt JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sconzo D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Adeeb N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ataoglu C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosenwasser RH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aziz-Sultan MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choudhri O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tjoumakaris SI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Swaid C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roy JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tos SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gooch MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Musmar B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riina H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abushehab A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keles A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Naamani K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blackburn S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sen RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salim HA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Atallah E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alwakaa O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Altschul DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guthikonda B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pukenas B</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Outcomes of arteriovenous malformation patients with multiple versus single feeders: A multicenter retrospective study with propensity-score matching.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The impact of multiple feeding arteries on clinical outcomes of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not well understood. This study aims to compare outcomes between AVMs with multiple versus single feeding arteries.&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance cohorts. Subgroup analysis was conducted for ruptured and unruptured AVMs and different treatment options, and multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of feeding artery origin.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 953 patients, 661(69.4%) had multiple feeding arteries, and 292 (30.6%) had a single feeding artery. After PSM, which included 422 matched </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-01T10:37:07.85Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:26:32.038Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11830163</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39953956</pubmed><doi>10.1177/23969873251319924</doi></cross_references></HashMap>