{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["35(2)"],"submitter":["Ji S"],"pubmed_abstract":["Strength training responses are influenced by sets, repetitions, and mechanical load, whereas Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training adds the variable of temporarily restricting blood flow via a tourniquet. This has intensified scientific discussions regarding the vascular responses and thereby safety of the BFR method. To address these concerns, we investigated intravascular pressure changes during low-load (LL-RT), low-load with BFR (LL-BFR-RT), and high-load (HL-RT) exercise. Ten healthy men (26.8 ± 4.59 years) performed unilateral biceps curls to failure in a randomized cross-over design: (1) LL-RT (30% 1RM), (2) LL-BFR-RT (30% 1RM, 50% LOP), and (3) HL-RT (75% 1RM). Total workload was significantly higher in LL-RT (692 ± 251 kg) compared to LL-BFR-RT (378 ± 58.7 kg) and HL-RT (327 ± 65"],"journal":["Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports"],"pagination":["e70029"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11832360"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Arterial and Venous Pressure Dynamics in Blood Flow Restriction Versus Traditional Strength Training."],"pmcid":["PMC11832360"],"pubmed_authors":["Ji S","Wahl P","Franz A","Luckmann S","Vicas M","Boemer T","Behringer M"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Arterial and Venous Pressure Dynamics in Blood Flow Restriction Versus Traditional Strength Training.","description":"Strength training responses are influenced by sets, repetitions, and mechanical load, whereas Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training adds the variable of temporarily restricting blood flow via a tourniquet. This has intensified scientific discussions regarding the vascular responses and thereby safety of the BFR method. To address these concerns, we investigated intravascular pressure changes during low-load (LL-RT), low-load with BFR (LL-BFR-RT), and high-load (HL-RT) exercise. Ten healthy men (26.8 ± 4.59 years) performed unilateral biceps curls to failure in a randomized cross-over design: (1) LL-RT (30% 1RM), (2) LL-BFR-RT (30% 1RM, 50% LOP), and (3) HL-RT (75% 1RM). Total workload was significantly higher in LL-RT (692 ± 251 kg) compared to LL-BFR-RT (378 ± 58.7 kg) and HL-RT (327 ± 65","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Feb","modification":"2025-04-26T12:37:09.609Z","creation":"2025-04-06T13:59:52.843Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11832360","cross_references":{"pubmed":["39961747"],"doi":["10.1111/sms.70029"]}}