<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>22(2)</volume><submitter>He YTN</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Pregnant women with twins and a short cervical length (CL) are at greater risk of preterm birth (PTB). The comparative efficacy of cervical cerclage and cervical pessary with or without additional progesterone to prevent PTB is unknown. We aimed to assess, in women with twin pregnancies and a short CL, the effectiveness of cerclage versus pessary and the additional treatment with 400 mg vaginal progesterone versus no progesterone in preventing PTB.&lt;h4>Methods and findings&lt;/h4>This multicenter, two-by-two factorial randomised trial was conducted in 2 hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm at 16 to 22 gestational weeks were recruited. Between March 2019 and July 2023, we randomised 219 participants (64.4% of the pla</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLoS medicine</journal><pagination>e1004526</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11844863</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Cervical cerclage versus cervical pessary with or without vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies and a short cervix: A two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11844863</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Nguyen TC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bui TQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He YTN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dang VQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le TV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vuong NT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mol BW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ho TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vuong LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pham HNH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nguyen DTN</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cervical cerclage versus cervical pessary with or without vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in twin pregnancies and a short cervix: A two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Pregnant women with twins and a short cervical length (CL) are at greater risk of preterm birth (PTB). The comparative efficacy of cervical cerclage and cervical pessary with or without additional progesterone to prevent PTB is unknown. We aimed to assess, in women with twin pregnancies and a short CL, the effectiveness of cerclage versus pessary and the additional treatment with 400 mg vaginal progesterone versus no progesterone in preventing PTB.&lt;h4>Methods and findings&lt;/h4>This multicenter, two-by-two factorial randomised trial was conducted in 2 hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm at 16 to 22 gestational weeks were recruited. Between March 2019 and July 2023, we randomised 219 participants (64.4% of the pla</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2026-06-01T21:58:03.957Z</modification><creation>2025-07-12T03:04:11.088Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11844863</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39982935</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pmed.1004526</doi></cross_references></HashMap>