<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(1)</volume><submitter>DiMartino L</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Methods of integrating qualitative data across diverse studies and within multi-site research consortia are less developed than those for integrating quantitative data. The development ofsuchmethods is essential to support the data exchange needed for cross-study qualitative inquiry and given the increasing emphasis on data sharing and open science. We describe methods for qualitative data integration within the National Cancer Institute's Improving the Management of symPtoms During And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium funded by the Cancer Moonshot&lt;sup>SM&lt;/sup>. Data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Our case study highlights potential solutions for unique challenges faced when integrating </pubmed_abstract><journal>Implementation science communications</journal><pagination>21</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11853699</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Development of a method for qualitative data integration to advance implementation science within research consortia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11853699</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Mitchell SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Connor M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herrin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCleary NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>IMPACT Consortium</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mai QH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahrens P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yanez B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Revette A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Griffin JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weiner BJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wehbe F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bian JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uno H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poirier-Shelton T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coughlin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dizon DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cronin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hemming K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richardson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kroner BL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Richardson K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garcia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mallow J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schrag D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hodgdon C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tyndall BD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Osarogiagbon RU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cella D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caron K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faris N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Redmond S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tesch N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bass M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ardini MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popovic J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barrett F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kroenke K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tofthagen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Begnoche M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reich J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Podratz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tasker L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cahue S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith AW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penedo F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tramontano A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jensen R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Flores AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>DiMartino L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutten L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lancki N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hazard-Jenkins HW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Preiss L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hassett MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schaepe K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pachman D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheville AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Norton WE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Austin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lam V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silberman P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dias S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ridgeway JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruddy K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carroll AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chlan L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simpson J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scholtens D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kircher S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pearson L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Development of a method for qualitative data integration to advance implementation science within research consortia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Methods of integrating qualitative data across diverse studies and within multi-site research consortia are less developed than those for integrating quantitative data. The development ofsuchmethods is essential to support the data exchange needed for cross-study qualitative inquiry and given the increasing emphasis on data sharing and open science. We describe methods for qualitative data integration within the National Cancer Institute's Improving the Management of symPtoms During And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium funded by the Cancer Moonshot&lt;sup>SM&lt;/sup>. Data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Our case study highlights potential solutions for unique challenges faced when integrating </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2025-04-18T21:17:09.786Z</modification><creation>2025-04-07T09:12:37.469Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11853699</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40001223</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s43058-025-00701-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>