<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>77(1)</volume><submitter>Pecorelli N</submitter><funding>Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna</funding><pubmed_abstract>Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is still controversial. A survey was carried out through the Italian community of pancreatic surgeons using institutional emails, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP) and the Italian Association of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery (AICEP). The survey was structured to learn surgeons' practice in using IPD through questions and one clinical vignette. Respondents were asked to report their regrets for omission and commission regarding the IPD use for the clinical scenario, eliciting a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were built to identify respondents' attitudes. One hundred six surgeon</pubmed_abstract><journal>Updates in surgery</journal><pagination>9-17</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11876192</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Italian survey about intraperitoneal drain use in distal pancreatectomy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11876192</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Raffaele DV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lucio C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Damiano P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donata C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Felice G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zerbi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Damiano C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Silvana P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pierluigi DS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alberto P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lorenzo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elisa B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giuliano B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davide C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruna T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fabrizio DB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niccolo N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vincenzo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiara B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Enrico P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stefano C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Francesca A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cucchetti A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stefano M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grazisa S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sergio A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gennnaro N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giuseppe M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maria EG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luca G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tommaso G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Antonella DV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donato G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Costanza ZC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ettore C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tommaso D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luca S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roberto C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ricci C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luca M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alberto PC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luigi V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gabriella L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roberto T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giovanni M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caterina MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boggi U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Domenico T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Partelli S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laura A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laura M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Domenico Stefano DDA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salvatore G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Esposito A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Meo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Capretti G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pecorelli N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falconi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Federico M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Antonio F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Butturini G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raffaele L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruno N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aldo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andrea Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alessandro A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giulio B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riccardo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frigerio I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alessio M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marco V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andrea R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davide P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carlo I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gianluca B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Batignani G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Francesco M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matteo Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gianluca G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salvatore P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riccardo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Serena L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pan-Drain study group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marco R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matteo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matteo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luciano C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marco M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Andrea B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marco A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michele C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giacomo Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Francesco G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michele M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matteo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salvia R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matteo B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alessandro F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Francesco I</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Italian survey about intraperitoneal drain use in distal pancreatectomy.</name><description>Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain (IPD) use in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is still controversial. A survey was carried out through the Italian community of pancreatic surgeons using institutional emails, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of the Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP) and the Italian Association of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery (AICEP). The survey was structured to learn surgeons' practice in using IPD through questions and one clinical vignette. Respondents were asked to report their regrets for omission and commission regarding the IPD use for the clinical scenario, eliciting a scale between 0 (no regret) and 100 (maximum regret). The threshold model and a multilevel mixed regression were built to identify respondents' attitudes. One hundred six surgeon</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jan</publication><modification>2025-04-04T01:12:42.668Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T01:12:42.668Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11876192</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39397215</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s13304-024-01987-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>