<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>74</volume><submitter>Kidess M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and objective&lt;/h4>Urology is characterized by continuous innovation. The inception of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) marked a pivotal technological advance and further advances in digital treatment options for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are emerging. Our aim was to assess patient willingness to receive an electronic artificial urinary sphincter (eAUS) implant and identify associated concerns.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients who received a first AUS implant (AMS800 system) for post-RP SUI from March 2013 to December 2023 were included. An anonymous survey was used to collect data on demographics, current AUS satisfaction, daily technology use, interest in an eAUS, and concerns about potential eAUS technical malfunctions. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with significa</pubmed_abstract><journal>European urology open science</journal><pagination>21-27</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11891701</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Next-generation Solutions: Are Patients Ready for Electronic Artificial Urinary Sphincters for Male Incontinence?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11891701</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Pyrgidis N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stief CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ivanova T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stadelmeier L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marcon J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chaloupka M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoffmann M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kidess M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bauer RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hermans J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Volz Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Next-generation Solutions: Are Patients Ready for Electronic Artificial Urinary Sphincters for Male Incontinence?</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and objective&lt;/h4>Urology is characterized by continuous innovation. The inception of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) marked a pivotal technological advance and further advances in digital treatment options for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are emerging. Our aim was to assess patient willingness to receive an electronic artificial urinary sphincter (eAUS) implant and identify associated concerns.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients who received a first AUS implant (AMS800 system) for post-RP SUI from March 2013 to December 2023 were included. An anonymous survey was used to collect data on demographics, current AUS satisfaction, daily technology use, interest in an eAUS, and concerns about potential eAUS technical malfunctions. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with significa</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-04T08:23:20.895Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T08:23:20.895Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11891701</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40066191</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.euros.2025.02.004</doi></cross_references></HashMap>