{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["48(3)"],"submitter":["Yasmin F"],"funding":["This study was supported by Qatar National Library."],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Recent guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) recommend revascularization of non-culprit lesions following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the optimal timing for this procedure-whether immediate or staged-remains uncertain.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search using PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies comparing clinical outcomes between immediate and staged revascularization approaches in patients with MVD undergoing PCI. A random effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comprising 3886 patients (1964 in the immediate revascularization group and 1940 in the staged revascularization group), with a median follow-up of 12 months, were included in the analysis. No significant difference in the risk of 1-year mortality was noted between the two approaches. The risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1-year follow-up was significantly lower in the immediate revascularization group compared to the staged revascularization group (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86; I²: 0%; p = 0.03). Additionally, the immediate revascularization group had a significantly lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) at 1-year follow-up than the staged approach (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37-0.88; I²: 10%; p = 0.01).<h4>Conclusion</h4>This meta-analysis suggests that immediate revascularization is associated with a significantly lower risk of TVR and MI at 1-year compared to staged revascularization."],"journal":["Clinical cardiology"],"pagination":["e70105"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11894271"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Versus Staged Revascularization of Nonculprit Arteries in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis."],"pmcid":["PMC11894271"],"pubmed_authors":["Iqbal J","Surani S","Sadiq M","Zaidi SF","Moeed A","Shahzad M","Yasmin F","Asghar MS","Alraies MC"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Versus Staged Revascularization of Nonculprit Arteries in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Recent guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) recommend revascularization of non-culprit lesions following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the optimal timing for this procedure-whether immediate or staged-remains uncertain.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search using PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies comparing clinical outcomes between immediate and staged revascularization approaches in patients with MVD undergoing PCI. A random effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comprising 3886 patients (1964 in the immediate revascularization group and 1940 in the staged revascularization group), with a median follow-up of 12 months, were included in the analysis. No significant difference in the risk of 1-year mortality was noted between the two approaches. The risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1-year follow-up was significantly lower in the immediate revascularization group compared to the staged revascularization group (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86; I²: 0%; p = 0.03). Additionally, the immediate revascularization group had a significantly lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) at 1-year follow-up than the staged approach (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.37-0.88; I²: 10%; p = 0.01).<h4>Conclusion</h4>This meta-analysis suggests that immediate revascularization is associated with a significantly lower risk of TVR and MI at 1-year compared to staged revascularization.","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025 Mar","modification":"2025-07-04T03:05:57.025Z","creation":"2025-04-20T01:46:42.227Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC11894271","cross_references":{"pubmed":["40065749"],"doi":["10.1002/clc.70105"]}}