<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>80</volume><submitter>Wimmer K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) is a clinicopathological tool designed to estimate late distant recurrence (LDR) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). While intended as a prognostic algorithm, its predictive value for ET extension remains uncertain.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The score was calculated in 4931 patients from four prospective randomized ABCSG trials (ABCSG-6, -6a, -8, and -16) with 250 LDR events. We assessed its prognostic power, calibration accuracy, and predictive value. Time to LDR was analyzed using Cox regression models.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In our cohorts, the CTS5 provided prognostic information whether used as a continuous or categorical score. In the ABCSG-8 cohort (n = 2054) and the combined ABCSG-6+8 cohort (n = 3308), a higher continuous score was significantly associated with increased LDR risk. The categorical CTS5 showed that high-risk patients had significantly higher LDR rates compared to low- or intermediate-risk patients. The score slightly overestimated LDR risk, regardless of predicted risk. Although no significant predictive value was found on the relative scale, an absolute LDR risk reduction of 23.4 % was found in patients with a high CTS5 of 5 when extended ET was administered additional five than two years. In patients with a CTS5 of 2, no benefit was found when ET was extended to 10 instead of 7 years.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The CTS5 is a valid tool for LDR risk stratification in HR + breast cancer, but should be used cautiously for determining benefits from ET extension, as no significant predictive value was found.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)</journal><pagination>104415</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11904565</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Validation of the CTS5 in four prospective, multicenter, randomized ABCSG trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11904565</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Hlauschek D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suppan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Egle D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fesl C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jakesz R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Helfgott R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Halper S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Solkner L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greil R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzal F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wimmer K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balic M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gampenrieder SP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Filipits M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gnant M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pfeiler G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singer CF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Austrian Breast &amp; Colorectal Cancer Study Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Steger G</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Validation of the CTS5 in four prospective, multicenter, randomized ABCSG trials.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years (CTS5) is a clinicopathological tool designed to estimate late distant recurrence (LDR) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). While intended as a prognostic algorithm, its predictive value for ET extension remains uncertain.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>The score was calculated in 4931 patients from four prospective randomized ABCSG trials (ABCSG-6, -6a, -8, and -16) with 250 LDR events. We assessed its prognostic power, calibration accuracy, and predictive value. Time to LDR was analyzed using Cox regression models.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In our cohorts, the CTS5 provided prognostic information whether used as a continuous or categorical score. In the ABCSG-8 cohort (n = 2054) and the combined ABCSG-6+8 cohort (n = 3308), a higher continuous score was significantly associated with increased LDR risk. The categorical CTS5 showed that high-risk patients had significantly higher LDR rates compared to low- or intermediate-risk patients. The score slightly overestimated LDR risk, regardless of predicted risk. Although no significant predictive value was found on the relative scale, an absolute LDR risk reduction of 23.4 % was found in patients with a high CTS5 of 5 when extended ET was administered additional five than two years. In patients with a CTS5 of 2, no benefit was found when ET was extended to 10 instead of 7 years.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The CTS5 is a valid tool for LDR risk stratification in HR + breast cancer, but should be used cautiously for determining benefits from ET extension, as no significant predictive value was found.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-01T19:03:24.279Z</modification><creation>2025-04-04T03:02:25.367Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11904565</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39985843</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2025.104415</doi></cross_references></HashMap>