<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>van Dorth D</submitter><funding>Dutch Research Council (NWO)</funding><pagination>281-290</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11913638</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12(2)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Early treatment effects in patients with glioblastoma are frequently discussed during multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM), after which a decision regarding (dis)continuation of tumor-targeted treatment is made. This study examined whether a separate and systematic evaluation of perfusion MRI (pMRI) could impact such treatment decisions in the early stage.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective observational study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy for detecting early tumor progression of 4 different approaches including conventional MRI, pMRI with Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL), and/or Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) MRI, and compared those to the MDTM evaluation in clinical practice.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Sixty-five glioblastoma patients with clinical and radiological data un</pubmed_abstract><journal>Neuro-oncology practice</journal><pubmed_title>Perfusion MRI-based differentiation between early tumor progression and pseudoprogression in glioblastoma and its use in clinical practice.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11913638</pmcid><funding_grant_id>17079</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Jiang FY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Osch MJP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Bresser J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koekkoek JAF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smits M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmitz-Abecassis B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Dorth D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taphoorn MJB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dirven L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Croese RJI</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Perfusion MRI-based differentiation between early tumor progression and pseudoprogression in glioblastoma and its use in clinical practice.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Early treatment effects in patients with glioblastoma are frequently discussed during multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM), after which a decision regarding (dis)continuation of tumor-targeted treatment is made. This study examined whether a separate and systematic evaluation of perfusion MRI (pMRI) could impact such treatment decisions in the early stage.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This retrospective observational study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy for detecting early tumor progression of 4 different approaches including conventional MRI, pMRI with Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL), and/or Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) MRI, and compared those to the MDTM evaluation in clinical practice.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Sixty-five glioblastoma patients with clinical and radiological data un</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-05T12:39:07.118Z</modification><creation>2025-04-05T12:39:07.118Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11913638</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40110054</pubmed><doi>10.1093/nop/npae099</doi></cross_references></HashMap>