<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>47(2)</volume><submitter>Meyns J</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The study aimed to compare the short- and long-term effectiveness of hybrid Hyrax (HH) -Facemask (FM) and HH-mentoplate (MP) treatment protocols for maxillary protraction using Alt-RAMEC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A single-center 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Participants: 28 skeletal class III patients (female: 14, male: 14; average age: 9.7 ± 1.3 years;) were included. Interventions: Two treatment groups where protraction therapy was combined with Alt-RAMEC. Group 1: Facemask group (Hybrid Hyrax + Facemask) and Group 2: Mentoplate group (Hybrid Hyrax + Mentoplate). Objective: To compare skeletal and dental changes between groups using low dose computed tomography (CT) scan from which virtual lateral cephalograms were generated. Outcome: Outcomes include changes in W</pubmed_abstract><journal>European journal of orthodontics</journal><pagination>cjaf011</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11920792</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomized controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11920792</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Politis C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shujaat S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meyns J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meewis J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schreurs A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobs R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aerts J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dons F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Long-term comparison of maxillary protraction with hybrid hyrax-facemask vs. hybrid hyrax-mentoplate protocols using Alt-RAMEC: a 5-year randomized controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The study aimed to compare the short- and long-term effectiveness of hybrid Hyrax (HH) -Facemask (FM) and HH-mentoplate (MP) treatment protocols for maxillary protraction using Alt-RAMEC.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A single-center 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Participants: 28 skeletal class III patients (female: 14, male: 14; average age: 9.7 ± 1.3 years;) were included. Interventions: Two treatment groups where protraction therapy was combined with Alt-RAMEC. Group 1: Facemask group (Hybrid Hyrax + Facemask) and Group 2: Mentoplate group (Hybrid Hyrax + Mentoplate). Objective: To compare skeletal and dental changes between groups using low dose computed tomography (CT) scan from which virtual lateral cephalograms were generated. Outcome: Outcomes include changes in W</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Feb</publication><modification>2026-05-23T03:19:57.321Z</modification><creation>2025-04-06T10:46:13.716Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11920792</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40105065</pubmed><doi>10.1093/ejo/cjaf011</doi></cross_references></HashMap>