<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lyall K</submitter><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>648-659</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11929602</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>18(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Prevalence of autism diagnosis has historically differed by demographic factors. Using data from 8224 participants drawn from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, we examined relationships between demographic factors and parent-reported autism-related traits as captured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; T score > 65) and compared these to relations with parent-reported clinician diagnosis of ASD, in generalized linear mixed effects regression analyses. Results suggested lower odds of autism diagnosis, but not of SRS T > 65, for non-Hispanic Black children (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55, 1.06) relative to non-Hispanic White children. Higher maternal education was associated with reduced odds of both outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51, 1.0</pubmed_abstract><journal>Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research</journal><pubmed_title>Demographic Correlates of Autism: How Do Associations Compare Between Diagnosis and a Quantitative Trait Measure?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11929602</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 HL159701</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 OD023319</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023290</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023251</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023272</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023271</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023332</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023253</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023275</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023337</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023313</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023279</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U2C OD023375</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023318</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 OD023382</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023285</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023282</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023289</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023288</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023244</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023365</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023320</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023342</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023286</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023249</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023348</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023347</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023248</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023389</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023268</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01 HL146980</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023328</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023349</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UH3 OD023305</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kelly RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Catellier DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frndak S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koinis-Mitchell D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trevino CO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith PB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ames JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dager SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Green AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmidt RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lyall K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aschner JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McEvoy CT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Page GP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ganiban JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Margolis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Croen LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stanford JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ozonoff S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cella D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hertz-Picciotto I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miller M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheinkopf SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joseph RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ma T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gern JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>D'Sa V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gissandaner TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murphy L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weiss ST</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hipwell AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gershon R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schweitzer JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bush NR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrara A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Camargo CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dickerson AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Volk HE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schantz SL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dunlop AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nguyen R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jacobson LP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oken E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graff JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Avalos LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karagas MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shuster CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Newby LK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>program collaborators for Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Messinger D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Demographic Correlates of Autism: How Do Associations Compare Between Diagnosis and a Quantitative Trait Measure?</name><description>Prevalence of autism diagnosis has historically differed by demographic factors. Using data from 8224 participants drawn from the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, we examined relationships between demographic factors and parent-reported autism-related traits as captured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS; T score > 65) and compared these to relations with parent-reported clinician diagnosis of ASD, in generalized linear mixed effects regression analyses. Results suggested lower odds of autism diagnosis, but not of SRS T > 65, for non-Hispanic Black children (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.76, 95% CI 0.55, 1.06) relative to non-Hispanic White children. Higher maternal education was associated with reduced odds of both outcomes (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51, 1.0</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Mar</publication><modification>2026-07-16T23:25:48.81Z</modification><creation>2026-07-12T03:11:23.76Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11929602</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39778060</pubmed><doi>10.1002/aur.3296</doi></cross_references></HashMap>