<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(3)</volume><submitter>Alberca I</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>This study explores the potential for the temporal and kinematic datas link to propulsion technique and athlete performance collected here to contribute to evidence-based classification for wheelchair badminton athletes.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Nineteen experienced wheelchair badminton players underwent propulsion tests with a badminton racket. Wheelchair were equipped with inertial measurement units. The first analysis conducted involved comparing the parameters between class WH1 and WH2. Subsequently, a hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on the parameters with significant differences.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Regarding propulsion technique parameters, WH1 athletes exhibit a longer braking phase compared to WH2 athletes. Generally, the performance of WH1 athlet</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pagination>e0315939</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11952265</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Trying to use temporal and kinematic parameters for the classification in wheelchair badminton.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11952265</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Watier B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vallier JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baconnais M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le Toquin B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brassart F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamri I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chenier F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alberca I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faupin A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Trying to use temporal and kinematic parameters for the classification in wheelchair badminton.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>This study explores the potential for the temporal and kinematic datas link to propulsion technique and athlete performance collected here to contribute to evidence-based classification for wheelchair badminton athletes.&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>Nineteen experienced wheelchair badminton players underwent propulsion tests with a badminton racket. Wheelchair were equipped with inertial measurement units. The first analysis conducted involved comparing the parameters between class WH1 and WH2. Subsequently, a hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on the parameters with significant differences.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Regarding propulsion technique parameters, WH1 athletes exhibit a longer braking phase compared to WH2 athletes. Generally, the performance of WH1 athlet</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2025-07-04T03:05:54.932Z</modification><creation>2025-07-04T03:05:54.932Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11952265</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40153392</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0315939</doi></cross_references></HashMap>