<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Poprzeczny AJ</submitter><funding>National Health and Medical Research Council</funding><pagination>709-723</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11969922</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>132(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Guidelines recommending regular physical activity in pregnancy for improving pregnancy outcomes are informed by published meta-analyses. Inclusion of randomised trials of poor methodological quality may bias effect estimates.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To assess the validity of these recommendations by focusing on trial quality.&lt;h4>Search strategy&lt;/h4>Systematic search of PubMed, PubMed Central, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL from inception to 14 December 2023.&lt;h4>Selection criteria&lt;/h4>Randomised trials evaluating an antenatal physical activity intervention alone, compared with no such intervention.&lt;h4>Data collection and analysis&lt;/h4>Trial quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Independent of this, studies we</pubmed_abstract><journal>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</journal><pubmed_title>Antenatal Physical Activity Interventions and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Trial Quality.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11969922</pmcid><funding_grant_id>1196133</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Louise J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deussen AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Slade L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitchell M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poprzeczny AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dodd JM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Antenatal Physical Activity Interventions and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Trial Quality.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Guidelines recommending regular physical activity in pregnancy for improving pregnancy outcomes are informed by published meta-analyses. Inclusion of randomised trials of poor methodological quality may bias effect estimates.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To assess the validity of these recommendations by focusing on trial quality.&lt;h4>Search strategy&lt;/h4>Systematic search of PubMed, PubMed Central, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL from inception to 14 December 2023.&lt;h4>Selection criteria&lt;/h4>Randomised trials evaluating an antenatal physical activity intervention alone, compared with no such intervention.&lt;h4>Data collection and analysis&lt;/h4>Trial quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Independent of this, studies we</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 May</publication><modification>2025-07-08T03:13:48.737Z</modification><creation>2025-07-08T03:13:48.737Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11969922</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39895455</pubmed><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.18084</doi></cross_references></HashMap>