<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(1)</volume><submitter>Sen E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The environmental impact and cost of volatile anesthetics are significant concerns in modern anesthesia. Automated end-tidal control systems aim to optimize anesthetic delivery by reducing waste and improving efficiency. This study compared the effectiveness of end-tidal controlled (EtControl) low-flow anesthesia to manually controlled (MC) low-flow anesthesia in elective surgeries.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>A randomized controlled trial.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study was conducted with 132 ASA Class I-II patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to the EtControl (n = 66) or MC (n = 66) groups. The primary outcomes included anesthetic agent consumption (mL).&lt;h4>Findings&lt;/h4>Anesthetic consumption was similar between the EtControl group</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC anesthesiology</journal><pagination>176</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC11987261</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The effects of end-tidal controlled low-flow anesthesia on anesthetic agent consumption in elective surgeries: randomized controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC11987261</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Sen E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mizrak A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ugur BK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ganidaglı S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yildiz F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cesur M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pirbudak L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The effects of end-tidal controlled low-flow anesthesia on anesthetic agent consumption in elective surgeries: randomized controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>The environmental impact and cost of volatile anesthetics are significant concerns in modern anesthesia. Automated end-tidal control systems aim to optimize anesthetic delivery by reducing waste and improving efficiency. This study compared the effectiveness of end-tidal controlled (EtControl) low-flow anesthesia to manually controlled (MC) low-flow anesthesia in elective surgeries.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>A randomized controlled trial.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This study was conducted with 132 ASA Class I-II patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to the EtControl (n = 66) or MC (n = 66) groups. The primary outcomes included anesthetic agent consumption (mL).&lt;h4>Findings&lt;/h4>Anesthetic consumption was similar between the EtControl group</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-02T04:18:57.705Z</modification><creation>2026-04-14T03:14:02.339Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC11987261</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40217133</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12871-025-03051-9</doi></cross_references></HashMap>