<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Massey DJ</submitter><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>iyaf022</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12005266</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>229(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Population genetic theory, and the empirical methods built upon it, often assumes that individuals pair randomly for reproduction. However, natural populations frequently violate this assumption, which may potentially confound genome-wide association studies, selection scans, and demographic inference. Within several recently admixed human populations, empirical genetic studies have reported a correlation in global ancestry proportion between spouses, referred to as ancestry-assortative mating. Here, we use forward genomic simulations to link correlations in global ancestry proportion between mates to the underlying mechanistic mate choice process. We consider the impacts of 2 types of mate choice model, using either ancestry-based preferences or social groups as the basis for mate pairing</pubmed_abstract><journal>Genetics</journal><pubmed_title>Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12005266</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R35 GM146926</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R35 GM133481</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Goldberg A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Massey DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szpiech ZA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations.</name><description>Population genetic theory, and the empirical methods built upon it, often assumes that individuals pair randomly for reproduction. However, natural populations frequently violate this assumption, which may potentially confound genome-wide association studies, selection scans, and demographic inference. Within several recently admixed human populations, empirical genetic studies have reported a correlation in global ancestry proportion between spouses, referred to as ancestry-assortative mating. Here, we use forward genomic simulations to link correlations in global ancestry proportion between mates to the underlying mechanistic mate choice process. We consider the impacts of 2 types of mate choice model, using either ancestry-based preferences or social groups as the basis for mate pairing</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2025-06-28T03:05:34.496Z</modification><creation>2025-06-28T03:05:34.496Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12005266</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39919029</pubmed><doi>10.1093/genetics/iyaf022</doi></cross_references></HashMap>