<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(2)</volume><submitter>Abraham-Aggarwal K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the perceptions of American Rhinologic Society (ARS) members on the compensation models of academic rhinologists and their impact on clinical practice, teaching, and academic responsibilities.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Survey study.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Academic rhinologists across the United States who are members of the ARS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A twenty-six-question survey was distributed to 295 ARS members. The survey collected demographic information such as years of experience, geographic location, practice setting, and consultation volume. It also explored various compensation models and their impact on compensation, patient volume, case types, and the ability to support teaching and academic responsibilities.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Out of 295 surveyed ARS members, 107 responded</pubmed_abstract><journal>OTO open</journal><pagination>e70107</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12010749</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Perceptions on Academic Rhinologist Compensation Models: An ARS Survey.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12010749</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Abraham-Aggarwal K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suresh S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spertus DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kacker A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang AB</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Perceptions on Academic Rhinologist Compensation Models: An ARS Survey.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the perceptions of American Rhinologic Society (ARS) members on the compensation models of academic rhinologists and their impact on clinical practice, teaching, and academic responsibilities.&lt;h4>Study design&lt;/h4>Survey study.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Academic rhinologists across the United States who are members of the ARS.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A twenty-six-question survey was distributed to 295 ARS members. The survey collected demographic information such as years of experience, geographic location, practice setting, and consultation volume. It also explored various compensation models and their impact on compensation, patient volume, case types, and the ability to support teaching and academic responsibilities.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Out of 295 surveyed ARS members, 107 responded</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr-Jun</publication><modification>2025-07-06T03:04:38.359Z</modification><creation>2025-07-06T03:04:38.359Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12010749</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40260397</pubmed><doi>10.1002/oto2.70107</doi></cross_references></HashMap>