<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Chaigneau M</submitter><funding>Canadian Institute of Health Research</funding><pagination>e102041</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12015236</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The current diagnostic pathway for patients with a suspected inherited bleeding disorder is long, costly, resource intensive, emotionally draining for patients and often futile, as half of patients will remain without a diagnosis and be labelled 'bleeding disorder of unknown cause'. Advances in understanding the genetic basis of the inherited bleeding disorders, coupled with both increasing infrastructure for genetic/genomic testing and decreasing costs, have increased the feasibility of introducing genomic testing into the clinical diagnostic pathway as a potential solution to improve the care of these patients. Yet, there remain evidence gaps on the optimal integration of genomic analysis into the diagnostic pathway.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>Using a multicentre ra</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Genomic testing for bleeding disorders (GT4BD): protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the introduction of whole genome sequencing early in the diagnostic pathway for patients with inherited bleeding disorders as compared with standard of care.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12015236</pmcid><funding_grant_id>RDP-193724</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bowman M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Conboy M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>James PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leung J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dinchong R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mahar A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paterson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sholzberg M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khalife R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thorpe K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grabell J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Good D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lillicrap D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chaigneau M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guerin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wheaton L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Callum J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Genomic testing for bleeding disorders (GT4BD): protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the introduction of whole genome sequencing early in the diagnostic pathway for patients with inherited bleeding disorders as compared with standard of care.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The current diagnostic pathway for patients with a suspected inherited bleeding disorder is long, costly, resource intensive, emotionally draining for patients and often futile, as half of patients will remain without a diagnosis and be labelled 'bleeding disorder of unknown cause'. Advances in understanding the genetic basis of the inherited bleeding disorders, coupled with both increasing infrastructure for genetic/genomic testing and decreasing costs, have increased the feasibility of introducing genomic testing into the clinical diagnostic pathway as a potential solution to improve the care of these patients. Yet, there remain evidence gaps on the optimal integration of genomic analysis into the diagnostic pathway.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>Using a multicentre ra</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2026-07-15T11:03:38.92Z</modification><creation>2025-07-03T03:05:12.689Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12015236</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40246558</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102041</doi></cross_references></HashMap>