<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Rengifo-Gonzalez M</submitter><funding>Swiss National Science Foundation</funding><funding>European Research Council</funding><pagination>3796</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12015366</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>16(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized genome engineering by allowing precise introductions of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, genome engineering in bacteria is still a complex, multi-step process requiring a donor DNA template for repair of DSBs. Prime editing circumvents this need as the repair template is indirectly provided within the prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA). Here, we developed make-or-break Prime Editing (mbPE) that allows for precise and effective genetic engineering in the opportunistic human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. In contrast to traditional prime editing in which a nicking Cas9 is employed, mbPE harnesses wild type Cas9 in combination with a pegRNA that destroys the seed region or protospacer adjacent motif. Since most bacteria poorly perform template-independent end joining, correctly genome-edited clones are selectively enriched during mbPE. We show that mbPE is RecA-independent and can be used to introduce point mutations, deletions and targeted insertions, including protein tags such as a split luciferase, at selection efficiencies of over 93%. mbPE enables sequential genome editing, is scalable, and can be used to generate pools of mutants in a high-throughput manner. The mbPE system and pegRNA design guidelines described here will ameliorate future bacterial genome editing endeavors.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature communications</journal><pubmed_title>Make-or-break prime editing for genome engineering in Streptococcus pneumoniae.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12015366</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NCCR AntiResist 51NF40_180541</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>200792</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>771534-PneumoCaTChER</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>TMPFP3_210202</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>192517</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>310030_200792</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>310030</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>771534</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazzuoli MV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Burnier J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janssen AB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veening JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rengifo-Gonzalez M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rueff AS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Make-or-break prime editing for genome engineering in Streptococcus pneumoniae.</name><description>CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized genome engineering by allowing precise introductions of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, genome engineering in bacteria is still a complex, multi-step process requiring a donor DNA template for repair of DSBs. Prime editing circumvents this need as the repair template is indirectly provided within the prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA). Here, we developed make-or-break Prime Editing (mbPE) that allows for precise and effective genetic engineering in the opportunistic human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae. In contrast to traditional prime editing in which a nicking Cas9 is employed, mbPE harnesses wild type Cas9 in combination with a pegRNA that destroys the seed region or protospacer adjacent motif. Since most bacteria poorly perform template-independent end joining, correctly genome-edited clones are selectively enriched during mbPE. We show that mbPE is RecA-independent and can be used to introduce point mutations, deletions and targeted insertions, including protein tags such as a split luciferase, at selection efficiencies of over 93%. mbPE enables sequential genome editing, is scalable, and can be used to generate pools of mutants in a high-throughput manner. The mbPE system and pegRNA design guidelines described here will ameliorate future bacterial genome editing endeavors.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-01T12:54:47.496Z</modification><creation>2025-07-03T03:05:02.581Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12015366</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40263274</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41467-025-59068-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>