<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>55(4)</volume><submitter>Chung HJ</submitter><funding>Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme LLC</funding><funding>Merck Sharp &amp;amp; Dohme LLC</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The phase 3 open-label KEYNOTE-426 study demonstrated that first-line pembrolizumab plus axitinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a global population. This subgroup analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab-axitinib versus sunitinib in patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-426 in East Asia (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Adults with clear cell mRCC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks with oral axitinib 5 mg twice daily or oral sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS, assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints were objectiv</pubmed_abstract><journal>Japanese journal of clinical oncology</journal><pagination>406-413</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12042800</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>First-line pembrolizumab-axitinib versus sunitinib in metastatic RCC: subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 in Eastern Asia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12042800</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Kondoh C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang JW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perini RF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomita Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bae WK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anai S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kimura G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uemura H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tamada S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Powles T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mizuno R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsubara N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molife LR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee HJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rini BI</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>First-line pembrolizumab-axitinib versus sunitinib in metastatic RCC: subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 in Eastern Asia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The phase 3 open-label KEYNOTE-426 study demonstrated that first-line pembrolizumab plus axitinib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a global population. This subgroup analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab-axitinib versus sunitinib in patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-426 in East Asia (Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Adults with clear cell mRCC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks with oral axitinib 5 mg twice daily or oral sunitinib 50 mg once daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS, assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints were objectiv</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Apr</publication><modification>2026-06-02T06:41:28.855Z</modification><creation>2025-07-08T03:13:45.065Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12042800</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39815637</pubmed><doi>10.1093/jjco/hyae182</doi></cross_references></HashMap>