<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>30(5)</volume><submitter>Roger SD</submitter><funding>Kalbe Genexine Biologics</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>Efepoetin alfa, a novel long-acting erythropoietin (EPO)-hybrid Fc fusion protein, represents a promising erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) for addressing anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This Phase 3 trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous efepoetin alfa in comparison to subcutaneous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta in stage 3 or 4 CKD patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase 3 trial enrolled 391 CKD stage 3 or stage 4 patients. Subjects underwent a 20-week correction period followed by an 8-week evaluation period. Responders continued treatment for an extra 24-week extension to evaluate long-term safety, maintenance effectiveness, and the longer treatment interval.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In the efepoe</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)</journal><pagination>e70046</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12079003</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Non-Inferiority of Subcutaneous Efepoetin Alfa Compared to Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta in Stage 3 or 4 CKD Patients: Insights From a Phase 3 Trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12079003</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Roger SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sung JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sangthawan P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aquitania G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shin SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hassah WHHW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ahmad MK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mazlan SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan LY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Isidto R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chiu YW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wong CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsu BG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kang YS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rubio-Bicol J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Na KR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vejakama P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peng YS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Noppakun K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee SH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Villaflor AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen CH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Na KY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Solimen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nugroho P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu IW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sarwono J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kan WC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jonny</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Asis N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Situmorang TD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krisanapan P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi BS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leong GB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahardjo KD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chou KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdul Wahab MZ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Non-Inferiority of Subcutaneous Efepoetin Alfa Compared to Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta in Stage 3 or 4 CKD Patients: Insights From a Phase 3 Trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aim&lt;/h4>Efepoetin alfa, a novel long-acting erythropoietin (EPO)-hybrid Fc fusion protein, represents a promising erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) for addressing anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This Phase 3 trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous efepoetin alfa in comparison to subcutaneous methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta in stage 3 or 4 CKD patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A randomised, multicentre, open-label Phase 3 trial enrolled 391 CKD stage 3 or stage 4 patients. Subjects underwent a 20-week correction period followed by an 8-week evaluation period. Responders continued treatment for an extra 24-week extension to evaluate long-term safety, maintenance effectiveness, and the longer treatment interval.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>In the efepoe</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 May</publication><modification>2026-07-15T08:28:10.645Z</modification><creation>2026-07-01T03:12:08.727Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12079003</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40369895</pubmed><doi>10.1111/nep.70046</doi></cross_references></HashMap>