<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>42(6)</volume><submitter>Deng L</submitter><funding>BeiGene</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Our previous study has suggested a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) with zanubrutinib over orelabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL). Here, we conducted an updated analysis to indirectly compare the long-term efficacy between zanubrutinib and orelabrutinib in patients with R/R MCL.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Individual patient data from the zanubrutinib study were adjusted to match the patient population profile of the orelabrutinib study. An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to adjust for effect modifiers and prognostic variables. The efficacy outcomes included investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR). Response evaluations were only computed tomography </pubmed_abstract><journal>Advances in therapy</journal><pagination>2937-2949</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12085368</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Versus Orelabrutinib in Patients with R/R MCL: An Extended Follow-up Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12085368</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Yang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deng L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ji J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zou D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lv F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feng R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jin J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gao S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Song Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Indirect Comparisons of Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Versus Orelabrutinib in Patients with R/R MCL: An Extended Follow-up Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Our previous study has suggested a favorable progression-free survival (PFS) with zanubrutinib over orelabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL). Here, we conducted an updated analysis to indirectly compare the long-term efficacy between zanubrutinib and orelabrutinib in patients with R/R MCL.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Individual patient data from the zanubrutinib study were adjusted to match the patient population profile of the orelabrutinib study. An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed to adjust for effect modifiers and prognostic variables. The efficacy outcomes included investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR). Response evaluations were only computed tomography </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jun</publication><modification>2026-06-01T19:12:23.347Z</modification><creation>2026-05-19T03:07:20.455Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12085368</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40317419</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s12325-025-03202-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>