<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sun X</submitter><funding>National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding</funding><funding>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding><pagination>271</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12123749</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive interstitial lung disease (ILD) but without evidence of systemic vasculitis have been reported in studies and are classified as isolated ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, the clinical significance of ANCA, particularly myeloperoxidase (MPO) -ANCA in IIP remains poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the differences between ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative IIP patients and further explore the impact of MPO-ANCA on clinical manifestations and prognostic outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We reviewed 408 ILD patients with available ANCA results from January 2012 to September 2021. 61 patients diagnosed with microscopic polyangiitis-associated ILD were not included in the analysis. A comparative analysis was performed between 61 isolated ANCA-positive IIP patients (ANCA-IIP group) and 286 ANCA-negative IIP patients (IIP group). We further conducted subgroup analyses based on the status of MPO-ANCA.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Baseline clinical characteristics, pulmonary function tests, radiological features and all-cause mortality were similar between ANCA-IIP and IIP groups. When comparing the MPO-ANCA-IIP group with the IIP group and the non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group separately, a higher proportion of fibrotic features was observed on imaging (P = 0.004 vs IIP group; P = 0.031 vs non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group). After one year of treatment, the MPO-ANCA-IIP group showed a significantly greater decline in pulmonary function parameters compared to both the IIP group and the non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group. The frequency of pulmonary function decline was significantly higher in the MPO-ANCA-IIP group compared to the non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group (P = 0.026). Additionally, MPO-ANCA was not found to be statistically associated with mortality among patients with IIP.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>ANCA-IIP patients had similar clinical characteristics and prognoses with IIP patients. MPO-ANCA-IIP patients had more prominent fibrosis on imaging and a greater decline in pulmonary function following treatment. Special attention should be paid to MPO-ANCA positivity during the diagnosis and treatment of IIP patients.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04413149, May 2020.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC pulmonary medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: a retrospective observational study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12123749</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2023YFC2507204</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2022-PUMCH-C-017</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Zhang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xue P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sun X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shi J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peng M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: a retrospective observational study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive interstitial lung disease (ILD) but without evidence of systemic vasculitis have been reported in studies and are classified as isolated ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, the clinical significance of ANCA, particularly myeloperoxidase (MPO) -ANCA in IIP remains poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the differences between ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative IIP patients and further explore the impact of MPO-ANCA on clinical manifestations and prognostic outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We reviewed 408 ILD patients with available ANCA results from January 2012 to September 2021. 61 patients diagnosed with microscopic polyangiitis-associated ILD were not included in the analysis. A comparative analysis was performed between 61 isolated ANCA-positive IIP patients (ANCA-IIP group) and 286 ANCA-negative IIP patients (IIP group). We further conducted subgroup analyses based on the status of MPO-ANCA.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Baseline clinical characteristics, pulmonary function tests, radiological features and all-cause mortality were similar between ANCA-IIP and IIP groups. When comparing the MPO-ANCA-IIP group with the IIP group and the non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group separately, a higher proportion of fibrotic features was observed on imaging (P = 0.004 vs IIP group; P = 0.031 vs non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group). After one year of treatment, the MPO-ANCA-IIP group showed a significantly greater decline in pulmonary function parameters compared to both the IIP group and the non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group. The frequency of pulmonary function decline was significantly higher in the MPO-ANCA-IIP group compared to the non-MPO-ANCA-IIP group (P = 0.026). Additionally, MPO-ANCA was not found to be statistically associated with mortality among patients with IIP.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>ANCA-IIP patients had similar clinical characteristics and prognoses with IIP patients. MPO-ANCA-IIP patients had more prominent fibrosis on imaging and a greater decline in pulmonary function following treatment. Special attention should be paid to MPO-ANCA positivity during the diagnosis and treatment of IIP patients.&lt;h4>Trial registration&lt;/h4>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04413149, May 2020.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 May</publication><modification>2026-06-03T07:57:30.776Z</modification><creation>2026-04-26T03:11:42.205Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12123749</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40442650</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12890-025-03736-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>