{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Chen R"],"funding":["National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project"],"pagination":["goaf040"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12167634"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["13"],"pubmed_abstract":["Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for treating advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases. Herein, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of PIPAC in this patient population. The literature between January 2011 and February 2024 was comprehensively searched on the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search, guided by the Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) framework, focused on studies reporting on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of PIPAC. Data were pooled by using log transformation (PLN) or Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Of the 451 initially identified studies, 18 were included in the met"],"journal":["Gastroenterology report"],"pubmed_title":["Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases: a comprehensive meta-analysis of feasibility, efficacy, and safety."],"pmcid":["PMC12167634"],"funding_grant_id":["2022YW030009"],"pubmed_authors":["Zheng J","Yang Z","Li Y","Yang Y","Li R","Chen R","Wang J"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases: a comprehensive meta-analysis of feasibility, efficacy, and safety.","description":"Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for treating advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases. Herein, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of PIPAC in this patient population. The literature between January 2011 and February 2024 was comprehensively searched on the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The search, guided by the Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) framework, focused on studies reporting on the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of PIPAC. Data were pooled by using log transformation (PLN) or Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Of the 451 initially identified studies, 18 were included in the met","dates":{"release":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2025","modification":"2026-04-07T20:19:55.606Z","creation":"2026-04-07T17:36:13.68Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC12167634","cross_references":{"pubmed":["40520131"],"doi":["10.1093/gastro/goaf040"]}}