<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>48(11)</volume><submitter>Sinn M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;p>Introduction: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is a frequent and medical relevant problem. Guidelines recommend treatment with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or direct oral factor-Xa inhibitors as rivaroxaban for ≥3 months. Patient's preference and convenience is an important factor to guide treatment decision and to support treatment adherence. No data are available so far about patient-reported outcome in CAT.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>CONKO-011/AIO-SUP-0115/ass. was an open-label, prospective, multicenter German phase III trial for cancer patients with newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE) randomized to rivaroxaban (Riva) or site-specific LMWH. Primary endpoint was patient-reported treatment satisfaction, measured by the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS). The 12-item A</pubmed_abstract><journal>Oncology research and treatment</journal><pagination>685-695</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12237281</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>CONKO-011/AIO-SUP-0115/ass.: Rivaroxaban Compared to Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Cancer Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12237281</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Pelzer U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Striefler JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riess H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hellmann M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roderburg C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trappe RU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sudhoff T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schlenska-Lange A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wernecke KD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohamed O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Semrau S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lohneis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heinz J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ettrich TJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krziwanie A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sinn M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Christoph DC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>CONKO-011/AIO-SUP-0115/ass.: Rivaroxaban Compared to Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Cancer Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism.</name><description>&lt;p>Introduction: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is a frequent and medical relevant problem. Guidelines recommend treatment with low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or direct oral factor-Xa inhibitors as rivaroxaban for ≥3 months. Patient's preference and convenience is an important factor to guide treatment decision and to support treatment adherence. No data are available so far about patient-reported outcome in CAT.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>CONKO-011/AIO-SUP-0115/ass. was an open-label, prospective, multicenter German phase III trial for cancer patients with newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE) randomized to rivaroxaban (Riva) or site-specific LMWH. Primary endpoint was patient-reported treatment satisfaction, measured by the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS). The 12-item A</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-06-06T17:23:53.198Z</modification><creation>2026-06-03T03:10:16.292Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12237281</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40418924</pubmed><doi>10.1159/000545976</doi></cross_references></HashMap>