<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(13)</volume><submitter>Sakiz E</submitter><pubmed_abstract>To advance our understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS), accurate identification of protein expression profiles as biomarkers for MS in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is critical. However, proteomic studies investigating MS have yielded inconsistent findings due to variability in sample sizes, diagnostic criteria, and data processing methods. We aimed to tackle these challenges by performing a thorough meta-analysis of proteomics datasets sourced from multiple independent studies. We conducted a thorough database search to gather all relevant studies using appropriate keywords. We screened articles using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, six studies were included. We retrieved and combined data from five CSF datasets for discovery and two additional datasets for validation </pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of molecular sciences</journal><pagination>6171</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12249574</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Cerebrospinal Fluid Associated with Multiple Sclerosis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12249574</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Avsar T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sakiz E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cubeddu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gamsjaeger R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amanzadeh Jajin E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Differentially Expressed Proteins in Cerebrospinal Fluid Associated with Multiple Sclerosis.</name><description>To advance our understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS), accurate identification of protein expression profiles as biomarkers for MS in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is critical. However, proteomic studies investigating MS have yielded inconsistent findings due to variability in sample sizes, diagnostic criteria, and data processing methods. We aimed to tackle these challenges by performing a thorough meta-analysis of proteomics datasets sourced from multiple independent studies. We conducted a thorough database search to gather all relevant studies using appropriate keywords. We screened articles using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, six studies were included. We retrieved and combined data from five CSF datasets for discovery and two additional datasets for validation </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jun</publication><modification>2026-06-30T03:28:22.176Z</modification><creation>2026-06-30T03:22:12.216Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12249574</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40649948</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ijms26136171</doi></cross_references></HashMap>