<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Wen D</submitter><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>Foundation for the National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>102342</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12279028</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>92</volume><pubmed_abstract>The term 'totipotency' has often been misapplied in stem cell research to describe cells with embryonic and extraembryonic bipotentiality, despite a lack of evidence that they can generate an entire organism from a single cell. Additionally, no specific term currently distinguishes bipotential stem cells from pluripotent cells, which contribute poorly to extraembryonic tissues. This review examines the developmental continuum from totipotency to pluripotency in early embryos and revisits the previously proposed concept of plenipotency in preimplantation development. We evaluate emerging stem cell models that exhibit bipotentiality but have lost the ability to autonomously initiate and sustain the sequential fate decisions necessary to develop into a complete organism. Unlike totipotent emb</pubmed_abstract><journal>Current opinion in genetics &amp; development</journal><pubmed_title>Totipotency or plenipotency: rethinking stem cell bipotentiality.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12279028</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01HD097268</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 GM129380</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01GM129380</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HD097268</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1R21OD031973</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 OD031973</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HD095938</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 GM129157</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Wen D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Totipotency or plenipotency: rethinking stem cell bipotentiality.</name><description>The term 'totipotency' has often been misapplied in stem cell research to describe cells with embryonic and extraembryonic bipotentiality, despite a lack of evidence that they can generate an entire organism from a single cell. Additionally, no specific term currently distinguishes bipotential stem cells from pluripotent cells, which contribute poorly to extraembryonic tissues. This review examines the developmental continuum from totipotency to pluripotency in early embryos and revisits the previously proposed concept of plenipotency in preimplantation development. We evaluate emerging stem cell models that exhibit bipotentiality but have lost the ability to autonomously initiate and sustain the sequential fate decisions necessary to develop into a complete organism. Unlike totipotent emb</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jun</publication><modification>2026-03-16T07:07:17.879Z</modification><creation>2025-08-17T03:05:45.1Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12279028</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40107116</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.gde.2025.102342</doi></cross_references></HashMap>