<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><submitter>Balaji B</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has emerged as an important tool for managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), offering real-time glucose data and the potential for improved glycemic control. Unlike traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), which provides intermittent readings, CGM captures continuous glucose fluctuations, including postprandial and nocturnal changes, which are critical in GDM management.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of CGM compared with SMBG in managing glycemic control in women with GDM, focusing on key glycemic metrics such as time in range (TIR) and glycemic variability (GV), and exploring their associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A comprehensive search of Pu</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of diabetes science and technology</journal><pagination>19322968251357873</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12286989</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>The Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Comparison to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12286989</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Uthra K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ram U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anjana RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lunghar J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hannah W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deepa M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mohan V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popova PV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balaji B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamalanathan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sagili H</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Comparison to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has emerged as an important tool for managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), offering real-time glucose data and the potential for improved glycemic control. Unlike traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), which provides intermittent readings, CGM captures continuous glucose fluctuations, including postprandial and nocturnal changes, which are critical in GDM management.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of CGM compared with SMBG in managing glycemic control in women with GDM, focusing on key glycemic metrics such as time in range (TIR) and glycemic variability (GV), and exploring their associations with maternal and neonatal outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A comprehensive search of Pu</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jul</publication><modification>2026-03-27T16:09:24.728Z</modification><creation>2025-08-30T03:05:56.179Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12286989</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40698417</pubmed><doi>10.1177/19322968251357873</doi></cross_references></HashMap>