<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15</volume><submitter>Gribben JG</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The objectives of this study were to identify key treatment attributes that drive physician and patient preferences for second line (2L) and third line (3L) treatments in relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multi- country, internet-based survey was administered to patients(N=195) with R/R FL and treating physicians (N=300) from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Brazil, and Japan. The survey included two discrete choice experiments - one for 2L and one for 3L treatment options - that prompted respondents to select their preferred option between two hypothetical treatment profiles varying on seven attributes associated with treatment for R/RFL: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), serious adverse event</pubmed_abstract><journal>Frontiers in oncology</journal><pagination>1589722</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12287033</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Patient and physician treatment preferences in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Brazil, and Japan.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12287033</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Patel A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kopenhafer L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gribben JG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beygi S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ray M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beusterien K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Will O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ball G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palivela M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ghione P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krupsky K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Best T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bachy E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Patient and physician treatment preferences in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a discrete choice experiment in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Brazil, and Japan.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>The objectives of this study were to identify key treatment attributes that drive physician and patient preferences for second line (2L) and third line (3L) treatments in relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multi- country, internet-based survey was administered to patients(N=195) with R/R FL and treating physicians (N=300) from the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Brazil, and Japan. The survey included two discrete choice experiments - one for 2L and one for 3L treatment options - that prompted respondents to select their preferred option between two hypothetical treatment profiles varying on seven attributes associated with treatment for R/RFL: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), serious adverse event</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025</publication><modification>2026-03-27T16:09:25.074Z</modification><creation>2025-08-30T03:05:44.898Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12287033</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40708935</pubmed><doi>10.3389/fonc.2025.1589722</doi></cross_references></HashMap>