<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>McLean RK</submitter><funding>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council,United Kingdom</funding><funding>Innovate UK,United Kingdom</funding><funding>Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>163</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12287429</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Nipah virus (NiV) causes a severe neurological disease in humans. The first NiV outbreak, in Malaysia, involved pig-to-human transmission, that resulted in significant economic losses to the local pig industry. Despite the risk NiV poses to pig-dense regions, no licensed vaccines exist. This study therefore assessed three NiV vaccine candidates in pigs: (1) adjuvanted soluble NiV (s)G protein, (2) adjuvanted pre-fusion stabilised NiV (mcs)F protein, and (3) adenoviral vectored NiV G (ChAdOx1 NiV G). NiV sG induced the strongest neutralising antibody response, NiV mcsF induced antibodies best able to neutralise cell-cell fusion, whereas ChAdOx1 NiV G elicited CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell responses. Despite differences in immunogenicity, prime-boost immunisation with all candidates conferred a hig</pubmed_abstract><journal>NPJ vaccines</journal><pubmed_title>Nipah virus vaccines evaluated in pigs as a 'One Health' approach to protect public health.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12287429</pmcid><funding_grant_id>971555</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BBS/E/I/00007039</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BBS/E/I/00007031</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Thakur N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Watterson D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bailey D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marsh GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hodgson S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gilbert SC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pedrera M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rowe B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Begum MN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Reid T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Isaacs A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bruce M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trinidad L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lowther S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergfeld J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhuyan AAM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Graham SP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lambe T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edwards S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahman MZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Au G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barr J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chappell K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tchilian E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Layton R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raue R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Todd S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mourino M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahman M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alam M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rye N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Young P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shanta IS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siddika A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elrefaey AME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fisher M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poole T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rahman S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McLean RK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Payne J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Riddell S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dalziel T</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Nipah virus vaccines evaluated in pigs as a 'One Health' approach to protect public health.</name><description>Nipah virus (NiV) causes a severe neurological disease in humans. The first NiV outbreak, in Malaysia, involved pig-to-human transmission, that resulted in significant economic losses to the local pig industry. Despite the risk NiV poses to pig-dense regions, no licensed vaccines exist. This study therefore assessed three NiV vaccine candidates in pigs: (1) adjuvanted soluble NiV (s)G protein, (2) adjuvanted pre-fusion stabilised NiV (mcs)F protein, and (3) adenoviral vectored NiV G (ChAdOx1 NiV G). NiV sG induced the strongest neutralising antibody response, NiV mcsF induced antibodies best able to neutralise cell-cell fusion, whereas ChAdOx1 NiV G elicited CD8&lt;sup>+&lt;/sup> T-cell responses. Despite differences in immunogenicity, prime-boost immunisation with all candidates conferred a hig</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jul</publication><modification>2026-07-15T14:14:25.802Z</modification><creation>2025-08-17T03:05:54.049Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12287429</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40702012</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41541-025-01212-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>