<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Sherry AD</submitter><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><funding>Andrew Sabin Family Foundation</funding><pagination>256</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12289950</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In phase III oncology trials, superiority is defined by statistical significance using P thresholds. However, this approach has been criticized because P is continuous. Here, we reconstruct patient-level data for 230 phase III oncology trials to model the robustness of statistical significance by estimating the survival-inferred fragility index (SIFI), defined as the smallest number of patients changing arms that alters the statistical significance interpretation. The median SIFI was 8 patients (IQR 4-19), representing 1.4% of enrollments (IQR 0.7%-3%). As a continuous statistic, P-but not the significance interpretation-was correlated with SIFI. Moreover, overall survival endpoints were more fragile than surrogate endpoints. Taken together, while phase III oncology trials are intended to </pubmed_abstract><journal>NPJ precision oncology</journal><pubmed_title>Survival-inferred fragility of statistical significance in phase III oncology trials.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12289950</pmcid><funding_grant_id>P30CA016672</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Miller AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kouzy R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ludmir EB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koong A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meirson T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El-Alam MB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCaw ZR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abi Jaoude J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bomze D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ofer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lin TA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Msaouel P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel RR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sherry AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Owiwi M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Survival-inferred fragility of statistical significance in phase III oncology trials.</name><description>In phase III oncology trials, superiority is defined by statistical significance using P thresholds. However, this approach has been criticized because P is continuous. Here, we reconstruct patient-level data for 230 phase III oncology trials to model the robustness of statistical significance by estimating the survival-inferred fragility index (SIFI), defined as the smallest number of patients changing arms that alters the statistical significance interpretation. The median SIFI was 8 patients (IQR 4-19), representing 1.4% of enrollments (IQR 0.7%-3%). As a continuous statistic, P-but not the significance interpretation-was correlated with SIFI. Moreover, overall survival endpoints were more fragile than surrogate endpoints. Taken together, while phase III oncology trials are intended to </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jul</publication><modification>2026-03-17T13:41:10.189Z</modification><creation>2025-08-16T03:05:31.188Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12289950</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40707724</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41698-025-01024-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>