<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Tomas CW</submitter><funding>Waisman Center from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development</funding><funding>VISN6 MIRECC</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><funding>German Research Society</funding><funding>Brain and Behavior Research Foundation</funding><funding>ZonMw</funding><funding>Dana Foundation</funding><funding>PHRC, Foundation Pierre Deniker</funding><funding>National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship</funding><funding>Academic Medical Center Research Council</funding><funding>VA National Center for PTSD</funding><funding>National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression</funding><funding>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding><funding>VISN17 Center of Excellence Pilot funding</funding><funding>National Institute of Mental Health</funding><funding>McLean Hospital Trauma Scholars Fund</funding><funding>Julia Kasparian Fund for Neuroscience Research</funding><funding>SAMRC Unit on Risk &amp; Resilience in Mental Disorders</funding><pagination>e70116</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12308910</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>46(11)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been associated with aberrations in brain networks in the absence of a given cognitive demand or task, called resting-state networks. Prior work has focused on disruption in the static functional connectivity (FC) among specific regions constrained by a priori hypotheses. However, dynamic FC, an approach that examines brain network characteristics over time, may provide a more sensitive measure to understand the network properties underlying dysfunction in PTSD. Further, using a data-driven analytic approach may reveal the contribution of other larger network disturbances beyond those revealed by hypothesis-driven examinations of ROIs or canonical networks. Therefore, the current study</pubmed_abstract><journal>Human brain mapping</journal><pubmed_title>Data-Driven Approach to Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An ENIGMA-PGC PTSD Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12308910</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MH101380</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01MH118467</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DA 1222/4-1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21MH112956</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01MH121653</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>40‐00812‐98‐10041</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01MH122774</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01MH119227</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MH071537</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K01MH118428</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01MH131532</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>40-00812-98-10041</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01MH113574</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>110614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 MH106574</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30-HD003352</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01MH105355‐01A</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DA 1222/4‐1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>27040</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01MH105355-01A</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RO1 MH111671</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MH098212</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>WA 1539/8-2</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>WA 1539/8‐2</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>deRoon-Cassini TA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nelson SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davenport ND</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baird CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huggins AA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haswell CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Disner SG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jovanovic T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdallah CG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baker JT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nitschke JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Werff SJA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xie H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cotton AS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gordon EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olff M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olatunji BO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lissek S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sambrook K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koch SBJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zilcha-Mano S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vermeiren RRJM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Walter H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzgerald JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davidson RJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manthey A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nawijn L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>El Hage W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neria Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thompson PM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larson CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van der Wee NJA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>May G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morey R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaufman ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cisler J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lebois LAM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stevens J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Zuiden M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herringa R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daniels JK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ross M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blackford JU</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Rooij SJH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koopowitz S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sierk A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Straube T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hussain A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Salminen LE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berg H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jahanshad N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ravid O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Veltman DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazarov A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Angstadt M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frijling JL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quide Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ipser J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liberzon I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Grupe DW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomas CW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McLaughlin KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sponheim SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stein DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fani N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shih C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suarez-Jimenez B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ressler K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peverill M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hofmann D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Data-Driven Approach to Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: An ENIGMA-PGC PTSD Study.</name><description>Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been associated with aberrations in brain networks in the absence of a given cognitive demand or task, called resting-state networks. Prior work has focused on disruption in the static functional connectivity (FC) among specific regions constrained by a priori hypotheses. However, dynamic FC, an approach that examines brain network characteristics over time, may provide a more sensitive measure to understand the network properties underlying dysfunction in PTSD. Further, using a data-driven analytic approach may reveal the contribution of other larger network disturbances beyond those revealed by hypothesis-driven examinations of ROIs or canonical networks. Therefore, the current study</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-03-31T10:36:00.995Z</modification><creation>2025-08-24T03:06:24.95Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12308910</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40736265</pubmed><doi>10.1002/hbm.70116</doi></cross_references></HashMap>