<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(8)</volume><submitter>Amrane K</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Among the aggressive non-small-cell lung carcinoma subtypes, pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare and poorly understood tumor. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with or/without (±) chemotherapy (ChT) versus ChT alone against advanced PSCs (APSCs).&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Using the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics Lung Cancer (ESME-LC) database (2015-2022), we analyzed APSC patients' first-line ICI ± ChT or ChT outcomes, then applied propensity score weighting to indirectly compare them.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 42 219 patients with untreated lung cancers, 229 (0.5%) had APSCs. One hundred and sixty-one (70.3%) received first-line treatment (43 ICI alone, 24 ICI + ChT, 94 ChT alone): median age, 66 years; 70.2% men; 69.8% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, among 106 available values; 86.2% smokers or former smokers. Molecular testing was done for 113/161 (70.2%) patients, 35.4% of whom had a molecular abnormality, most frequently a KRAS mutation (39.7%). Programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion scores determined for 43.5% of tumors (70/161) were: 68.6% ≥50%, 8.6% 1%-49%, and 22.9% &lt;1%. For the ICI ± ChT group, median PFS and OS were 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-8.2 months] and 20.6 months (95% CI 10.3-32.4 months), respectively. For ChT-alone recipients, median PFS and OS were 2.2 months (95% CI 2.0-3.0 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI 4.3-10.0 months), respectively. Applying a propensity score, ICI ± ChT was significantly associated with longer PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.72, P &lt; 0.001) and longer OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.74, P = 0.002) than ChT alone.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>According to this real-world analysis, first-line ICI ± ChT seems to have considerably improved the prognosis of APSCs.</pubmed_abstract><journal>ESMO open</journal><pagination>105343</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12309934</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy of first-line treatments for advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas: a real-world analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12309934</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Perol M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Debieuvre D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bosquet L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guisier F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schneider S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrari V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Girard N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lena H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Descourt R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dansin E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bigot F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chouaid C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quantin X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Madroszyk A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bizieux A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Justeau G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Amrane K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simoneau Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cabarrou B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falchero L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy of first-line treatments for advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas: a real-world analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Among the aggressive non-small-cell lung carcinoma subtypes, pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare and poorly understood tumor. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy [progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with or/without (±) chemotherapy (ChT) versus ChT alone against advanced PSCs (APSCs).&lt;h4>Patients and methods&lt;/h4>Using the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics Lung Cancer (ESME-LC) database (2015-2022), we analyzed APSC patients' first-line ICI ± ChT or ChT outcomes, then applied propensity score weighting to indirectly compare them.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 42 219 patients with untreated lung cancers, 229 (0.5%) had APSCs. One hundred and sixty-one (70.3%) received first-line treatment (43 ICI alone, 24 ICI + ChT, 94 ChT alone): median age, 66 years; 70.2% men; 69.8% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, among 106 available values; 86.2% smokers or former smokers. Molecular testing was done for 113/161 (70.2%) patients, 35.4% of whom had a molecular abnormality, most frequently a KRAS mutation (39.7%). Programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion scores determined for 43.5% of tumors (70/161) were: 68.6% ≥50%, 8.6% 1%-49%, and 22.9% &lt;1%. For the ICI ± ChT group, median PFS and OS were 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-8.2 months] and 20.6 months (95% CI 10.3-32.4 months), respectively. For ChT-alone recipients, median PFS and OS were 2.2 months (95% CI 2.0-3.0 months) and 6.8 months (95% CI 4.3-10.0 months), respectively. Applying a propensity score, ICI ± ChT was significantly associated with longer PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.72, P &lt; 0.001) and longer OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.74, P = 0.002) than ChT alone.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>According to this real-world analysis, first-line ICI ± ChT seems to have considerably improved the prognosis of APSCs.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jul</publication><modification>2026-03-31T10:37:46.094Z</modification><creation>2025-08-24T03:07:27.132Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12309934</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40706224</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105343</doi></cross_references></HashMap>