<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Gottschalk S</submitter><funding>European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme</funding><pagination>683-690</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12322465</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(7)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Recent studies, including the TENSION trial, support the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke with large infarct (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) 3-5).&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EVT compared with best medical care (BMC) alone in this population from a German healthcare payer perspective.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model (lifetime horizon) were used to compare healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between EVT and BMC. The effectiveness of EVT was reflected by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcome from the TENSION trial. QALYs were based on published mRS-specific health utilities (EQ-5D-3L indices). Long-term healthcare </pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of neurointerventional surgery</journal><pubmed_title>Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with established large infarct in Germany: a decision tree and Markov model.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12322465</pmcid><funding_grant_id>754640</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Bendszus M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonekamp S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomalla G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zelenak K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Krajina A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Simonsen CZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hill MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gottschalk S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aamodt AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Konig HH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fuentes B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gizewski ER</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Subtil F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pierot L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Denis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dams J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cost-effectiveness of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with established large infarct in Germany: a decision tree and Markov model.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Recent studies, including the TENSION trial, support the use of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke with large infarct (Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) 3-5).&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EVT compared with best medical care (BMC) alone in this population from a German healthcare payer perspective.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A short-term decision tree and a long-term Markov model (lifetime horizon) were used to compare healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between EVT and BMC. The effectiveness of EVT was reflected by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcome from the TENSION trial. QALYs were based on published mRS-specific health utilities (EQ-5D-3L indices). Long-term healthcare </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jun</publication><modification>2026-07-15T12:51:11.335Z</modification><creation>2025-09-01T03:05:56.518Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12322465</accession><cross_references><pubmed>38906688</pubmed><doi>10.1136/jnis-2024-021837</doi></cross_references></HashMap>