<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>England BR</submitter><funding>BLRD VA</funding><funding>RRD VA</funding><funding>HSRD VA</funding><funding>NIAMS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIGMS NIH HHS</funding><funding>CSRD VA</funding><pagination>e166-e177</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12337451</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Uncertainty exists regarding patient outcomes when using TNF inhibitors versus other biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). We compared survival and respiratory hospitalisation outcomes following initiation of TNF-inhibitor or non-TNF inhibitor biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We did a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, observational cohort study with propensity score matching following the target trial emulation framework using US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic and administrative health records. VA health-care enrollees with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD an</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Lancet. Rheumatology</journal><pubmed_title>Advanced therapies in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, cohort study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12337451</pmcid><funding_grant_id>I01 RX003644</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 AR072583</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>I01 BX004660</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P20 GM130423</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>I01 CX001703</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>SDR 02-237</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 GM115458</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>IK2 CX002203</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Frideres H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roul P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rojas J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sauer BC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baker JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>England BR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Johnson TM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mikuls TR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Curtis JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sayles H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matson SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>George MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cannon GW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Advanced therapies in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, cohort study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Uncertainty exists regarding patient outcomes when using TNF inhibitors versus other biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). We compared survival and respiratory hospitalisation outcomes following initiation of TNF-inhibitor or non-TNF inhibitor biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We did a retrospective, active-comparator, new-user, observational cohort study with propensity score matching following the target trial emulation framework using US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic and administrative health records. VA health-care enrollees with rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD an</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Mar</publication><modification>2026-06-06T10:55:20.834Z</modification><creation>2026-05-29T03:12:47.654Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12337451</accession><cross_references><pubmed>39793598</pubmed><doi>10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00265-0</doi><doi>10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00265-0</doi></cross_references></HashMap>