<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Barwatt J</submitter><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>Foundation for the National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>e0013248</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12342302</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Several antigen-detection assays have been developed for the rapid diagnosis of talaromycosis, but their utility has been limited by a lack of commercial options. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of the performance of our in-house monoclonal antibody-based Mp1p antigen-detecting enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with its recently-developed commercial platform.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this diagnostic accuracy, retrospective, case-cohort study, we compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of the commercial Wantai Mp1p EIA versus our in-house Mp1p EIA on paired plasma and urine samples from 424 hospitalized adults with advanced HIV disease, including 224 cases of proven talaromycosis, where Tala</pubmed_abstract><journal>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Comparative performance of a commercial and in-house Mp1p antigen-detecting enzyme immunoassay for the rapid diagnosis of talaromycosis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12342302</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U01AI169358</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI143409</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 AI169358</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01AI143409</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Cai JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Venugopalan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ly VT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoa NT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Le T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yuen KY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thu NTM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barwatt J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sambath HN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gonzalez P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Comparative performance of a commercial and in-house Mp1p antigen-detecting enzyme immunoassay for the rapid diagnosis of talaromycosis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Several antigen-detection assays have been developed for the rapid diagnosis of talaromycosis, but their utility has been limited by a lack of commercial options. The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of the performance of our in-house monoclonal antibody-based Mp1p antigen-detecting enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with its recently-developed commercial platform.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this diagnostic accuracy, retrospective, case-cohort study, we compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of the commercial Wantai Mp1p EIA versus our in-house Mp1p EIA on paired plasma and urine samples from 424 hospitalized adults with advanced HIV disease, including 224 cases of proven talaromycosis, where Tala</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-05-04T22:01:41.98Z</modification><creation>2026-04-07T21:00:55.899Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12342302</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40749024</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0013248</doi></cross_references></HashMap>