<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>31(8)</volume><submitter>Liang Z</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Tetanus remains an important global public health concern. Currently, the only recommended passive immunization therapy for tetanus prophylaxis is plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin (HTIG), which faces a global supply shortage and can transmit infectious pathogens. Despite not being endorsed by WHO due to safety concerns, equine tetanus antitoxin remains widely used in some countries. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate siltartoxatug-a first-in-class recombinant monoclonal antibody-for tetanus postexposure prophylaxis. Participants (n = 675) were randomized (2:1) to receive a single intramuscular injection of siltartoxatug 10 mg or HTIG 250 IU. The study met its primary outcome, with siltartoxatug demonstrating superiority to HTIG in the proportion o</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nature medicine</journal><pagination>2673-2681</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12353795</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Recombinant monoclonal antibody siltartoxatug versus plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin for tetanus: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12353795</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Wu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ding B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ding J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bin W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guo Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liao H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deng Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhan H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cheng D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zheng W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yan X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhang Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yu A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ouyang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiang W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cai W</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Recombinant monoclonal antibody siltartoxatug versus plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin for tetanus: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 trial.</name><description>Tetanus remains an important global public health concern. Currently, the only recommended passive immunization therapy for tetanus prophylaxis is plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin (HTIG), which faces a global supply shortage and can transmit infectious pathogens. Despite not being endorsed by WHO due to safety concerns, equine tetanus antitoxin remains widely used in some countries. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate siltartoxatug-a first-in-class recombinant monoclonal antibody-for tetanus postexposure prophylaxis. Participants (n = 675) were randomized (2:1) to receive a single intramuscular injection of siltartoxatug 10 mg or HTIG 250 IU. The study met its primary outcome, with siltartoxatug demonstrating superiority to HTIG in the proportion o</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-07-15T06:26:41.493Z</modification><creation>2026-07-01T03:07:09.992Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12353795</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40628965</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41591-025-03791-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>