<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Smith BJ</submitter><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>939-952</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12354331</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>32(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Examine the role of income, perceived healthy foods availability, and consumption as mediators of rural-urban health disparities.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Pre-registered simple mediation models with post hoc multi-mediator models were tested using national- and state-level survey data. Oregon data was collected in an online Qualtrics survey between October 8 and November 9, 2021 using CloudResearch; Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, a nationally representative dataset, was collected over 4 cycles from 2017 to 2020. Oregon residents (n = 771; rural = 313, urban = 458) self-reported online: income, perceived fruits and vegetable (FV) availability, FV consumption, and BMI measures (height, weight). HINTS respondents (rural n = 1235; urban n = 13,912) self-reported the same variables of interest without FV availability, and with an additional self-rated health variable detailed below.  RESULTS: The effect of rurality on BMI (b = 0.012, SE = 0.005, p = 0.01) and self-rated health (b = 0.003, SE = 0.001, p = 0.008) when combining datasets was mediated by a series of income, perceived FV availability, and FV consumption.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>To address rural-urban health disparities, individual (cognition, behavior), social (household income), and community (healthy food availability) factors should be targeted together.</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of behavioral medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Income, Healthy Food Availability, and Consumption Mediate Rural-Urban Health Disparities.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12354331</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 DK128575</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA240452</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 DA048756</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>BCS2220295</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>DA048756</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL158555</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01HL158555</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA240452</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA211224</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01DK128575</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CA211224</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Tomiyama AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mantell B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berkman ET</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>John DH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith BJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Income, Healthy Food Availability, and Consumption Mediate Rural-Urban Health Disparities.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Examine the role of income, perceived healthy foods availability, and consumption as mediators of rural-urban health disparities.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>Pre-registered simple mediation models with post hoc multi-mediator models were tested using national- and state-level survey data. Oregon data was collected in an online Qualtrics survey between October 8 and November 9, 2021 using CloudResearch; Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, a nationally representative dataset, was collected over 4 cycles from 2017 to 2020. Oregon residents (n = 771; rural = 313, urban = 458) self-reported online: income, perceived fruits and vegetable (FV) availability, FV consumption, and BMI measures (height, weight). HINTS respondents (rural n = 1235; urban n = 13,912) self-reported the same variables of interest without FV availability, and with an additional self-rated health variable detailed below.  RESULTS: The effect of rurality on BMI (b = 0.012, SE = 0.005, p = 0.01) and self-rated health (b = 0.003, SE = 0.001, p = 0.008) when combining datasets was mediated by a series of income, perceived FV availability, and FV consumption.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>To address rural-urban health disparities, individual (cognition, behavior), social (household income), and community (healthy food availability) factors should be targeted together.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Dec</publication><modification>2026-06-15T06:11:55.161Z</modification><creation>2026-06-15T03:08:31.638Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12354331</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40295464</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s12529-025-10362-1</doi></cross_references></HashMap>