<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>de Araujo MP</submitter><funding>Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico</funding><funding>Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo</funding><pagination>1336</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12362891</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>25(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This study reports an economic evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian healthcare system. This is a secondary outcome of a three-year randomised controlled trial that compared Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) to the Hall Technique (HT) for managing occluso-proximal caries lesions in primary molars. The primary outcome showed that the HT had a higher survival rate compared to ART and the economic evaluation was to test cost-effectiveness.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Children (5-10 years old) in public schools of Tietê-SP/Brazil, were randomly allocated to either the ART or HT arm. Treatment survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The economic evaluation considered baseline and cumulative material and professional costs based on the Brazilian National Health S</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC oral health</journal><pubmed_title>Economic Evaluation of ART and Hall in Primary Molars.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12362891</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2015/18098-2</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>310972/2021-3</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Olegario IC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Araujo MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Innes NP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Braga MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hesse D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mendes FM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Raggio DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garbim JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonifacio CC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Economic Evaluation of ART and Hall in Primary Molars.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>This study reports an economic evaluation from the perspective of the Brazilian healthcare system. This is a secondary outcome of a three-year randomised controlled trial that compared Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) to the Hall Technique (HT) for managing occluso-proximal caries lesions in primary molars. The primary outcome showed that the HT had a higher survival rate compared to ART and the economic evaluation was to test cost-effectiveness.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Children (5-10 years old) in public schools of Tietê-SP/Brazil, were randomly allocated to either the ART or HT arm. Treatment survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The economic evaluation considered baseline and cumulative material and professional costs based on the Brazilian National Health S</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-04-08T19:19:40.208Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T13:05:50.775Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12362891</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40830451</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12903-025-06528-8</doi></cross_references></HashMap>