<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>35</volume><submitter>Nuamek T</submitter><pubmed_abstract>There is an unmet need in patient monitoring between the end of radiotherapy and the first follow-up appointment during which patients may experience severe side effects. Personalised follow-up has the potential to tailor healthcare to individual needs. ePROMs enable remote monitoring and identification of those needing earlier intervention. To assess the feasibility of integrating ePROMs into personalised follow-up of patients after radiotherapy. Patients with lung or head and neck (HN) cancer were enrolled. ePROMs questionnaires, comprising EQ-5D-5L and 14 lung or 19 HN cancer-specific questions adapted from CTCAE v5.0, were sent to patients at eight timepoints: pre-radiotherapy, mid-radiotherapy, end of radiotherapy, weekly for four weeks post-treatment, and first face-to-face follow-up appointment. Upon completion, automated advice was provided based on responses. Grade 2 or above symptoms were escalated to clinicians. Patient feedback was obtained through structured interviews. Over two months, 19 eligible patients (10 lung, 9 HN) were recruited: 13 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and six received radiotherapy alone. ePROMs completion rate was 69.1%, ranging from 47.4% to 89.5% at each timepoint. Three patients reported grade 3 or above symptoms on 5 instances during and after radiotherapy. Fourteen patients participated in the interviews: all 14 reported ePROMs were easy to complete, took an acceptable amount of time, and made them feel better supported. Integrating ePROMs into personalised follow-up is feasible and acceptable to patients. ePROMs provide insights into patients' symptoms during and after radiotherapy, highlighting the need for a tailored approach.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Technical innovations &amp; patient support in radiation oncology</journal><pagination>100333</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12365331</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Integrating Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) into Personalised Follow-up for Patients after Radiotherapy. A Feasibility Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12365331</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Harris M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Price J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woolf D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bowen Jones S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nuamek T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Horne A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gurumurthy G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barker C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yorke J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomson D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdulwahid D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Banfill K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pemberton L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Payne A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faivre-Finn C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sheikh HY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kwateng PAN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bayman N</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Integrating Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) into Personalised Follow-up for Patients after Radiotherapy. A Feasibility Study.</name><description>There is an unmet need in patient monitoring between the end of radiotherapy and the first follow-up appointment during which patients may experience severe side effects. Personalised follow-up has the potential to tailor healthcare to individual needs. ePROMs enable remote monitoring and identification of those needing earlier intervention. To assess the feasibility of integrating ePROMs into personalised follow-up of patients after radiotherapy. Patients with lung or head and neck (HN) cancer were enrolled. ePROMs questionnaires, comprising EQ-5D-5L and 14 lung or 19 HN cancer-specific questions adapted from CTCAE v5.0, were sent to patients at eight timepoints: pre-radiotherapy, mid-radiotherapy, end of radiotherapy, weekly for four weeks post-treatment, and first face-to-face follow-up appointment. Upon completion, automated advice was provided based on responses. Grade 2 or above symptoms were escalated to clinicians. Patient feedback was obtained through structured interviews. Over two months, 19 eligible patients (10 lung, 9 HN) were recruited: 13 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and six received radiotherapy alone. ePROMs completion rate was 69.1%, ranging from 47.4% to 89.5% at each timepoint. Three patients reported grade 3 or above symptoms on 5 instances during and after radiotherapy. Fourteen patients participated in the interviews: all 14 reported ePROMs were easy to complete, took an acceptable amount of time, and made them feel better supported. Integrating ePROMs into personalised follow-up is feasible and acceptable to patients. ePROMs provide insights into patients' symptoms during and after radiotherapy, highlighting the need for a tailored approach.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-07T00:14:36.261Z</modification><creation>2026-04-07T22:21:17.835Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12365331</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40842525</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100333</doi></cross_references></HashMap>