<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Palandri F</submitter><funding>Ministero della Salute</funding><pagination>e70062</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12369922</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>131(17)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The response to ruxolitinib after 6 months (RR6) model allows early identification of ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis (MF) patients with poorer overall survival (OS); however, it is less applicable to lower-risk patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>To further explore this, the authors performed a subanalysis of the "RUX-MF" study (NCT06516406) with an aim to validate the RR6 and to develop a score specific for intermediate-1 DIPSS/MYSEC-PM risk patients.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among the 776 evaluable patients, 34.4%, 47.8%, and 17.8% were at low, intermediate, and high RR6 risk, with 5-year OS of 64.1%, 51.8%, and 44.5%, respectively (p &lt; .001). In the 428 intermediate-1 patients, the RR6 model did not discriminate between intermediate and low-risk patients (5-year OS: 74.4% vs. 72.0%, p </pubmed_abstract><journal>Cancer</journal><pubmed_title>Revised "iRR6" model in intermediate-1 risk myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12369922</pmcid><funding_grant_id>RC-2024-2790083</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pugliese N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonifacio M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Crugnola M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scalzulli E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Strazimiri A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cilloni D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Duminuco A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Heidel FH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Benevolo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martino B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Isidori A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Breccia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palandri F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beggiato E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Branzanti F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lemoli RM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dedola A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morsia E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tosoni L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Binotto G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tieghi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farina M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pane F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abruzzese E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caocci G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kuykendall AT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bocchia M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sartor C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palumbo GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cavazzini F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tiribelli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elli EM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Revised "iRR6" model in intermediate-1 risk myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>The response to ruxolitinib after 6 months (RR6) model allows early identification of ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis (MF) patients with poorer overall survival (OS); however, it is less applicable to lower-risk patients.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>To further explore this, the authors performed a subanalysis of the "RUX-MF" study (NCT06516406) with an aim to validate the RR6 and to develop a score specific for intermediate-1 DIPSS/MYSEC-PM risk patients.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among the 776 evaluable patients, 34.4%, 47.8%, and 17.8% were at low, intermediate, and high RR6 risk, with 5-year OS of 64.1%, 51.8%, and 44.5%, respectively (p &lt; .001). In the 428 intermediate-1 patients, the RR6 model did not discriminate between intermediate and low-risk patients (5-year OS: 74.4% vs. 72.0%, p </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-07-15T06:26:49.875Z</modification><creation>2026-07-01T03:07:16.517Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12369922</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40839414</pubmed><doi>10.1002/cncr.70062</doi></cross_references></HashMap>