<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Devine S</submitter><funding>Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada</funding><funding>UK Research and Innovation,United Kingdom</funding><pagination>60</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12371001</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>10(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The decoy effect describes a bias in which people's choices between two valuable options are swayed by a third, inferior, "decoy" option. Despite being documented in lab settings, relatively little work has investigated whether decoy effects occur "in the wild" where consumers face large, diverse choice sets. We employ a new methodology to examine the impact of decoy options on purchase decisions using a dataset of 3.6 million UK grocery-store wine transactions. Results indicate that when comparing wines that vary in quality and price across contexts, the presence of dominated (i.e., inferior) decoy options increased consumers' likelihood of choosing a target option-a hallmark of the well-documented attraction effect. The strength of these effects was modest overall (roughly 1% change in preference) and, interestingly, depended on consumers' idiosyncratic histories of experience. Our study provides a proof of principle demonstrating that these sorts of context effects are detectable in richer, complex real-world consumer choice settings.</pubmed_abstract><journal>NPJ science of learning</journal><pubmed_title>How decoy options ferment choice biases in real-world consumer decision-making.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12371001</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MR/T043520/1)</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Devine S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goulding J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harvey J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Otto AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Skatova A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>How decoy options ferment choice biases in real-world consumer decision-making.</name><description>The decoy effect describes a bias in which people's choices between two valuable options are swayed by a third, inferior, "decoy" option. Despite being documented in lab settings, relatively little work has investigated whether decoy effects occur "in the wild" where consumers face large, diverse choice sets. We employ a new methodology to examine the impact of decoy options on purchase decisions using a dataset of 3.6 million UK grocery-store wine transactions. Results indicate that when comparing wines that vary in quality and price across contexts, the presence of dominated (i.e., inferior) decoy options increased consumers' likelihood of choosing a target option-a hallmark of the well-documented attraction effect. The strength of these effects was modest overall (roughly 1% change in preference) and, interestingly, depended on consumers' idiosyncratic histories of experience. Our study provides a proof of principle demonstrating that these sorts of context effects are detectable in richer, complex real-world consumer choice settings.</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Aug</publication><modification>2026-05-09T10:36:48.385Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T00:48:15.566Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12371001</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40841543</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41539-025-00341-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>