<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>12</volume><submitter>Zhang X</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although contingency management has shown some efficacy in substance use disorder treatment, digital contingency management (DCM) needs more evidence supporting its value in treating substance misuse.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DCM in treating substance use disorder by examining 2 key outcome variables-abstinence and appointment attendance.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A 12-month quasi-experimental design was conducted by enrolling patients into 2 groups using an alternating assignment process: one group receiving treatment-as-usual plus DCM and the other receiving treatment as usual with no contingency management. Propensity score matching was conducted to match groups on covariates. After matching, t tests were conducted to examine the differe</pubmed_abstract><journal>JMIR mental health</journal><pagination>e73617</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12404579</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Digital Contingency Management for Substance Use Disorder Treatment: 12-Month Quasi-Experimental Design.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12404579</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Zhang X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hardcastle V</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Digital Contingency Management for Substance Use Disorder Treatment: 12-Month Quasi-Experimental Design.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Although contingency management has shown some efficacy in substance use disorder treatment, digital contingency management (DCM) needs more evidence supporting its value in treating substance misuse.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DCM in treating substance use disorder by examining 2 key outcome variables-abstinence and appointment attendance.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A 12-month quasi-experimental design was conducted by enrolling patients into 2 groups using an alternating assignment process: one group receiving treatment-as-usual plus DCM and the other receiving treatment as usual with no contingency management. Propensity score matching was conducted to match groups on covariates. After matching, t tests were conducted to examine the differe</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-06-03T06:06:44.35Z</modification><creation>2026-05-29T03:06:25.602Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12404579</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40896835</pubmed><doi>10.2196/73617</doi></cross_references></HashMap>