<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>van Pamelen J</submitter><funding>Dutch National MS Foundation</funding><pagination>20552173251370830</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12405697</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>11(3)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), the assessment of clinical disease activity can be challenging.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To determine the diagnostic potential of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) to distinguish a relapse from other causes of deterioration.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this multicenter, prospective study, RRMS patients with new neurological symptoms in the last 14 days were followed for 12 weeks. A diagnosis was established by the treating physician or, when in doubt, a panel of experienced neurologists. Blood samples were taken at baseline and week 12.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 65 patients were included. At baseline, patients with a clear relapse had a significantly higher median sNfL (14.6 pg/mL) than those wit</pubmed_abstract><journal>Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical</journal><pubmed_title>Relapse or no relapse in multiple sclerosis: Can disease activity biomarkers support the clinician?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12405697</pmcid><funding_grant_id>OZ2018-007</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Arnoldus EPJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Killestein J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lissenberg BI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Pamelen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>van Vliet J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koel-Simmelink MJA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Visser LH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Teunissen CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Beukelaar J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Relapse or no relapse in multiple sclerosis: Can disease activity biomarkers support the clinician?</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), the assessment of clinical disease activity can be challenging.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To determine the diagnostic potential of serum neurofilament light (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) to distinguish a relapse from other causes of deterioration.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>In this multicenter, prospective study, RRMS patients with new neurological symptoms in the last 14 days were followed for 12 weeks. A diagnosis was established by the treating physician or, when in doubt, a panel of experienced neurologists. Blood samples were taken at baseline and week 12.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 65 patients were included. At baseline, patients with a clear relapse had a significantly higher median sNfL (14.6 pg/mL) than those wit</description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Jul-Sep</publication><modification>2026-05-29T22:02:41.743Z</modification><creation>2026-04-08T06:13:29.044Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12405697</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40909760</pubmed><doi>10.1177/20552173251370830</doi></cross_references></HashMap>