<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Mauck MC</submitter><funding>National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases</funding><funding>The Back Pain Consortium</funding><funding>NCCIH NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NINDS NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>NIAMS NIH HHS</funding><funding>Department of Defense</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>538-553</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC12405758</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a common condition that impacts quality of life and function. There are many evidence-based treatments to address cLBP; however, treatment effects are modest, perhaps in part due to individual variation in treatment response. The Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments (BEST) trial was designed as the collaborative centerpiece of the Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) research program. This consortium was sponsored by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) as part of the Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>The BEST trial was a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) designed with the primary goal of identifying in whom different treatments show optimal </pubmed_abstract><journal>Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)</journal><pubmed_title>The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC12405758</pmcid><funding_grant_id>1K23AT011389-01A1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 MD016467</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K23 AT011389</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>W81XWH-21-PRMRP-CTA [PR212158]</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RM1NS128956-01A1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 AR076730</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1R21MD016467-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24AR076730</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01DA058694-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RM1 NS128956</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 NS135833</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01NS135833-01A1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA058694</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Chadwick AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kidwell KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones Berkeley S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Napadow VJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chidgey B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wilson L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mageswaran P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lotz JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peltier S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ivanova A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kosorok MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marras WS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lobo R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harte S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fritz JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Batorsky A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Castellanos J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bell KM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hurley RW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patel KV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weber KA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piva SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Psioda M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gunn CA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoffmeyer A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fields AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Neill C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sperger J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sowa GA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCumber M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rundell SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anstrom KJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wasan AD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dalton D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carey TS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Knapik GG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mao J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitchell UH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bailey JF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brooks AK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schneider MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dufour JS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Majumdar S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McLean SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schrepf A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Greco CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zeidan F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barth KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hassett AL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wallace MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Goolsby RW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mehling W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Borckardt JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harris RE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rowland B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mauck MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vo N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kaplan C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clauw DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bowden AE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Weaver TE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kurillo G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mackey S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bagaason S</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a common condition that impacts quality of life and function. There are many evidence-based treatments to address cLBP; however, treatment effects are modest, perhaps in part due to individual variation in treatment response. The Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments (BEST) trial was designed as the collaborative centerpiece of the Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) research program. This consortium was sponsored by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) as part of the Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>The BEST trial was a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) designed with the primary goal of identifying in whom different treatments show optimal </description><dates><release>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2025 Sep</publication><modification>2026-07-15T14:25:30.933Z</modification><creation>2026-07-05T03:12:25.238Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC12405758</accession><cross_references><pubmed>40205455</pubmed><doi>10.1093/pm/pnaf032</doi></cross_references></HashMap>